The Commission’S Novel Eu Migration Strategy: Waiting For The Cracking Boundary Forward

 

Steve Peers

Today this Commission releases its European Union immigration strategy. The concluding text is non available yet, but hither are my thoughts on the before version, leaked on Monday. I volition update them if the concluding strategy differs significantly from the leaked draft.

Content

The migration strategy is divided into 3 parts. First of all, it sets out ‘immediate action’ to address the migrant expiry crisis. Secondly, it describes an agenda for immigration administration inward iv areas: irregular immigration, edge management, asylum as well as legal migration. Finally, it briefly sets out around long-term objectives.

Immediate action

The ‘immediate action’ department largely elaborates upon the strategy already defined yesteryear European Union leaders inward answer to the deaths inward the Mediterranean. As I discussed already, this is a little answer to the crisis, focussed mainly upon enlarging European Union interception operations inward the Mediterranean as well as destroying smugglers’ boats.   

However, the Commission newspaper suggests to a greater extent than ambition inward ii areas. First, it wants to larn farther on the ‘relocation’ of asylum-seekers betwixt Member States. This would hateful that frontline states similar Italia as well as Republic of Malta do non possess got to bargain amongst thence many asylum-seekers, which would commonly hold out their responsibleness nether the EU’s Dublin rules on this issue. So on this issue, the Commission volition advise yesteryear the halt of May ‘emergency response’ legislation on the Earth of Article 78(3) of the TFEU, which volition allocate asylum-seekers coming equally role of a volume influx betwixt Member States. These laws volition hold out plain of study to a qualified bulk vote inward the Council, but the European Parliament (EP) volition exclusively hold out consulted. The Commission volition thence follow that upward amongst a proposal yesteryear the halt of 2015 for a permanent organisation of relocation, on the Earth of the ‘ordinary legislative procedure’, ie the usual powers of the EP. I possess got already discussed separately the query of whether they would apply to the UK.

Secondly, the Commission wants to larn farther on resettlement, ie the entry of recognised refugees directly inward 3rd U.S. into the EU. On this issue, the Commission volition brand a Recommendation on resettlement, to hold out followed yesteryear a binding proposal for legislation if this proves insufficient. Extra European Union funds volition hold out made available to assistance resettlement.

Irregular immigration

First of all, the Commission wants to address root causes of irregular migration, yesteryear focussing the coin the European Union already spends on these issues. There is no clear commitment to to a greater extent than spending. Next, the Commission wants to address smuggling of migrants, amongst an ‘Action Plan’ to hold out produced yesteryear the halt of May. The Commission doesn’t advert this, but a review of the electrical current European Union legislation on smuggling of migrants is directly underway. Also, the Commission wants to accept farther activity to enforce the EU’s Directive on occupation of irregular migrants (on the implementation of this Directive, encounter give-and-take here).

Also, the Commission wants to address the number of return, yesteryear prioritising countries of root for readmission treaties amongst the EU, providing guidelines on the application of the European Union Return Directive (see here on implementation of that Directive), as well as giving the European Union Border Agency, Frontex, the ability to initiate expulsion missions. The Commission volition advise legislation on the latter number on the Earth of an evaluation to hold out completed yesteryear the halt of the year.

Border management

Commission proposals hither largely urge to a greater extent than implementation of existing European Union rules. The exclusively concrete maiden is a commitment to relaunch the EU’s ‘Smart Borders’ proposals, for an entry-exit organisation of non-EU nationals, yesteryear the start of 2016. But the Commission was planning to do this anyway.

Asylum

The 2nd stage of European Union legislation on asylum is partly applicable already: the ‘qualification Directive’ on the Definition as well as content of refugee as well as subsidiary protection condition should possess got applied from the halt of 2013, as well as the ‘Dublin III’ rules on asylum-seeker responsibleness applied from the start of 2014. The other revised rules, on the ‘Eurodac’ system, asylum-seekers’ reception as well as asylum procedures, apply from July 2015 already.

The Commission promises to focus on implementation of these laws, yesteryear issuing guidance documents as well as prioritising infringement procedures against Member U.S. which do non apply the police describe properly. It volition equally good review the Dublin organisation inward 2016, as well as may suggest proposals to speed upward processing inward cases involving security countries of origin.

Legal migration

The Commission supports a legal migration policy based on demographic needs to increase the working-age population inward the EU. It volition comport a ‘fitness check’ of existing legislation, as well as encourages swift understanding on its proposal on students as well as researchers, which has around been agreed yesteryear the Council as well as EP (for analysis of this proposal, encounter here). Also, yesteryear the halt of May, it volition review the ‘Blue Card’ legislation on admission of highly-skilled migrants, referring peculiarly to attracting investors as well as increasing mobility betwixt Member U.S. (on implementation of the electrical current police describe as well as the issues for reform, encounter here).

The Commission equally good suggests a novel initiative, to adopt rules on the provision of services yesteryear non-EU citizens. There are already provisions on this number inward European Union free-trade agreements, but the Commission wants measure rules for all non-EU citizens. An of import indicate hither is that these rules should at to the lowest degree inward role apply to all Member States, since they line of piece of work organisation international trade, an exclusive European Union competence which is non plain of study to whatever opt-outs.  Arguably that exclusive competence applies to marketplace position access issues equally distinct from the related immigration rules, where opt-outs should nevertheless apply, but this may demand to hold out clarified.

Finally, the Commission refers to visa policy, namely its existing proposal to meliorate the European Union visa code as well as its pre-existing excogitation to review the listing of countries whose nationals require a visa.  It equally good suggests giving a little sum of extra cash to 3rd countries equally regards migration management.

Long-term objectives

Without offering a data, the Commission outlines longer-term objectives inward 3 areas. As regards asylum, it suggests that in that location could hold out a mutual code of European Union asylum law, mutual recognition of asylum decisions, as well as a mutual decision-making process. It is non clear if the latter would involve the Commission or around other European Union trunk making asylum decisions, and/or a mutual courtroom reviewing asylum appeals (following the model of the EU’s planned patent court).

Secondly, equally regards edge control, the Commission reiterates long-held goals of a mutual European Union edge guard, or at to the lowest degree a mutual coastguard.

Finally, equally regards legal migration, the Commission suggests an EU-wide appear of involvement system, thence that people are applying to all Member U.S. for a job, non exactly private States.  

Comments

The Treaties refer to a ‘common’ European Union policy on immigration, asylum as well as edge control. But the Commission’s proposed agenda does non start from that concluding objective as well as inquire itself what is necessary for the European Union to give it. Rather it starts from the condition quo as well as asks what incremental changes demand to hold out made to it to address specific issues.

On the immediate query of addressing the migrant crisis, the strategy newspaper essentially implements what European Union countries already agreed, apart from the relocation as well as resettlement proposals. The relocation proposals inward especial are belike politically unrealistic, given that Member U.S. over the years possess got repeatedly refused to adopt binding rules on this issue.

The resettlement proposals are less unreal, since the Commission plans to start amongst a non-binding stair out backed upward yesteryear extra European Union money, which should attract Member U.S. to offering resettlement opportunities. Only if that does non move would the Commission accept the unrealistic stair of proposing binding rules. This role of the excogitation is peculiarly welcome, since it would cut the number of migrants inward demand of protection who undertake the dangerous journeying to the European Union inward the get-go place. However, the numbers involved compared to the totals labor that journeying are probable to hold out tiny: the Commission proposal of 20,000 a yr yesteryear 2020 is little plenty (there were over one-half a 1000000 asylum applications inward the European Union finally year) but is unlikely to hold out agreed yesteryear Member States.

On smuggling legislation, to a greater extent than could hold out done to exempt humanitarian activities clearly from the rules, but changing the police describe lonely volition non halt smugglers. On the other paw in that location are many legal, political as well as practical problems facing the EU’s excogitation to destroy migrant boats. The excogitation is opposed yesteryear the de facto regime inward Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya – the real people whom the European Union has to move amongst to solve the conflict inward Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya inward the get-go place.

The excogitation equally regards returns legislation is to brand the electrical current rules move to a greater extent than effectively, yesteryear agreeing to a greater extent than readmission treaties as well as carrying out to a greater extent than removal operations. But coupled amongst the excogitation to meliorate asylum police describe to fast-track assessment of applications from supposed ‘safe countries of origin’, in that location is a jeopardy that people volition hold out removed to dangerous countries before their demand for protection has been properly assessed.

Also equally regards asylum, in that location is a focus on applying existing rules. In principle, this could Pb to a pregnant increase inward the aeroplane of harmonisation betwixt Member States, since the second-phase asylum rules possess got eliminated a lot of the legal divergences that the before stage of European Union asylum police describe provided for. However, it depends on the political volition of the Commission, which has promised to enforce European Union asylum police describe many times before – as well as failed to do thence every time. There’s no especial of how the enhanced focus on infringement proceedings volition work, as well as until in that location is, this looks similar a hope the Commission is making amongst its fingers crossed behind its back.

As regards legal migration, to a greater extent than admission of highly-skilled migrants as well as service providers inward areas of economical demand would hold out useful, as well as admission of tourists, researchers as well as students could boost the European Union economy. Some of the measures to this halt are already nether discussion. But the Commission makes a fairly weak commitment equally regards the enforcement of other European Union legislation on legal migration, given that (for instance) many non-EU citizens human face upward barriers to line of piece of work solid unit of measurement reunion, as well as the Commission reported inward 2011 that European Union laws on long-term residents are non properly applied yesteryear Member States.

Finally, the Commission’s long-term plans are interesting but plans along these lines (particularly equally regards edge guards) possess got been rejected before yesteryear Member States. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 especial disappointment hither is the failure to suggest early on adoption of rules on the transfer of protection of refugees who motility betwixt Member States, given that around refugees already possess got the correct to motility betwixt European Union countries as well as in that location is an existing Council of Europe treaty setting out rules on this number that the European Union could exercise equally a template (see the ECRE report on this issue).

On the whole then, the Commission strategy newspaper is largely a repackaging of things which the European Union is already committed to doing or already negotiating, or which are already inward place. It shouldn’t hold out necessary to adopt plans to enforce rules which are already the law, as well as the intention to do thence exactly exposes the previous failings of the Commission on this score. It remains to hold out seen if issuing ‘guidance documents’ has whatever useful final result inward practise (the Commission should commit itself to an independent review of this), as well as the promises relating to infringement proceedings hateful nada until the Commission tells us what this means, as well as regularly as well as openly reports on its practise to this end. The plans for farther legislation inward the nigh time to come are essentially modest, but inward places (fast-track asylum assessment as well as expulsions, straight to to a greater extent than countries of origin) lift serious potential human rights concerns. And the strategy newspaper concludes amongst the legal equivalent of a flock of flight pigs.

All this volition ultimately Pb to around other serial of little steps forwards toward a mutual European Union policy on borders, immigration as well as asylum. But it falls curt of the pregnant changes that could hold out made if in that location were plenty political volition inward the Commission as well as the Member States.

 

Barnard & Peers: chapter 26

Share this post