Is The Eu Coming To Relieve Legal Aid, Or To Bury It? An Assessment Of Negotiations On The Proposed Directive

by Claire Perinaud (FREE Group Trainee)

For many people facing criminal charges, legal help is essential if they want to defend themselves effectively. The European Union is planning to adopt legislation on this number inward the nigh future. But volition it genuinely brand a pregnant contribution to ensuring suspects’ rights inward this area?

State of implementation of the Procedural rights roadmap.

After years of unsuccessful attempts, starting inward 2004 alongside a general Commission proposal on procedural rights, it was alone from the halt of 2009 that the European Union legislation on procedural rights for suspects in addition to accused persons inward criminal proceedings has progressively taken shape. This was due to the entry into strength of the Treaty of Lisbon (TFEU art. 82(2) instantly confer the ability to adopt legislation on this issue), to article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights (providing for the correct to a fair trial) in addition to to a political “roadmap” yesteryear which, inward Nov 2009 the Council relaunched the Commission master copy proposals next a step-by-step approach instead of trying to adopt comprehensive legislation equally initially foreseen inward 2004.

However it is to a greater extent than than probable that this pragmatic approach in addition to the transition from unanimity to qualified bulk voting of the European Union Member US inward the Council (as from the entry into strength of the Treaty of Lisbon) has made possible the adoption inward co-decision alongside the European Parliament of the iii showtime legislative measures on suspects’ rights: Directive 2010/64/EU on the correct to interpretation in addition to translation in criminal proceedings; Directive 2012/13/EU on the correct to information inward criminal proceedings; in addition to Directive 2013/48/EU on the correct of access to a lawyer inward criminal proceedings.

Building on this success, at the halt of Nov 2013 the Commission proposed a 2nd “package” of suspects’ rights measures, comprising: a directive on procedural safeguards for children who are suspected or accused inward criminal proceedings; a recommendation on procedural safeguards for vulnerable people suspected or accused inward criminal proceedings; a directive strengthening of for certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the correct to last acquaint at trial inward criminal proceedings; a directive on the correct to provisional legal aid for citizens suspected or accused of a crime; in addition to a recommendation on the correct to legal help for suspects or accused persons inward criminal proceedings.

In 2014 the Council already reached a general approach on the proposal for a directive on procedural safeguards for children and on the directive on the presumption of innocence. On this ground the dialogue betwixt the Council in addition to the European Parliament (EP) is virtually to start in addition to it is possible that inward the coming months an understanding could last reached hence that these texts could last adopted already at the EP’s “first reading”.

Last calendar week the Council reached (after 8 months of internal negotiations!) a general approach also on the draft Directive on provisional legal help for persons deprived of freedom inward criminal proceedings in addition to volition start inward the coming weeks the dialogue alongside the Parliament also on this text.  

The coming months volition in addition to then last extremely of import for European Union procedural rights inward criminal matters fifty-fifty if it volition non last tardily to attain the high results that the European Parliament in addition to some Member US were expecting. In the absence of the energetic force of the quondam Commission Vice President Reding at that spot is a risk that the negotiations may attain the lowest mutual denominator betwixt the Member US also due to the unwillingness of some of them to adopt whatsoever European Union legislation which tin transportation away practise farther fiscal in addition to internal institutional tensions.

Legal help : why larn far uncomplicated when you lot tin transportation away larn far tricky ?

The draft Directive on legal help is in all likelihood the text which is currently facing the most adverse winds. Already the initial Commission’s political selection non to bargain alongside legal help inward the Directive on the access to lawyer has created an artificial disconnection from the correct to legal help in addition to the to a greater extent than full general “right to legal advice” which is required yesteryear the ECHR jurisprudence equally good equally yesteryear the European Union Charter (Articles 47 in addition to 48). (On the human rights aspects of the correct to legal aid, catch the annex).

Instead of tabling a proposal that would encompass these 2 interconnected rights, the Commission chose to come upwards forrad alongside a proposal on the right to access to a lawyer (now Directive 2013/48/EU) and, separately, alongside this proposal, which is intended nonetheless only equally a partial complement to the 2013 Directive. In the words of the Commission, “the … proposal is closely linked to Directive 2013/48/EU on the correct of access to a lawyer in addition to it aims to contributing to rendering effective the correct on access to a lawyer provided for inward that Directive at the early on stages of the proceedings for suspects or accused persons deprived of liberty”. Thus, no full general rules on legal aid, but a mere stop-gap to ensure that inward the rattling early on stage of the proceedings some shape of legal help is provided.

Even worse, on the same 24-hour interval that the Commission transmitted its proposal to the European Parliament in addition to to the Council, the Commission adopted a non-binding Recommendation on the correct to legal help for suspects or accused persons inward criminal proceedings . The aim of this Recommendation is “to foster for certain convergence equally regards the assessment of eligibility of legal help inward the Member States, equally good equally encouraging the Member US to accept activeness to amend the lineament in addition to effectiveness of legal help services in addition to administration“.

The legal ground of the Recommendation aside, its understanding of the implementation of the correct to legal help inward criminal proceedings is broader than that of the draft Directive.
According to the Recommendation the correct of legal help has to last guaranteed to whatsoever suspect or accused soul “from the fourth dimension they are made aware, yesteryear official notification or otherwise, yesteryear the competent authorities, that they are suspected or accused of having committed a criminal offence, in addition to irrespective of whether they are deprived of liberty”, yesteryear putting forrad the role of the correct to legal aid, namely to complement in addition to homecoming effective the correct of access to a lawyer equally set out inward Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament in addition to of the Council.

The operate inward the Council

The Council started exam of this proposal alone inward July 2014 nether the Italian Presidency. However, no understanding was constitute in addition to at the Dec 2014 Justice in addition to Home Affairs Council alone a “state of play” was presented to Ministers. At the JHA Council on 12-13 March the Council agreed its general approach. Its seat shows some pregnant differences compared to the initial Commission proposal which, equally outlined above, was already unambitious:

o a broad possibility for Member US to innovate exceptions to the application of the correct to provisional legal help for pocket-size offences (not farther defined) (Article 2 (3));

o a farther possibility for Member US to dependent area the admission to provisional legal help to discretionary criteria if this refers to “less serious offences” (once again, undefined) (Article iv (2bis));

o the elimination of the possibility to access provisional legal help inward European Arrest Warrant proceedings equally far equally legal assistance inward the issuing Member State is concerned (Article five (2) of the Commission proposal).

In substance, Member US are left complimentary to define the reach of application of the (limited) correct to provisional legal aid, alongside all but the most serious offences equally possible exceptions.

It is difficult, inward lite of this result, to detect whatsoever existent added value inward the text provisionally agreed yesteryear the Council. This thought is shared yesteryear a number of delegations (such equally France, Spain, Italy, Portugal, Belgium), which, inward the course of written report of the Council debate, own got made reference to the intention of subscribing a declaration, to last added to the minutes of the Council, inward which they limited their disappointment. However, these delegations own got non blocked the adoption of the full general approach, preferring instead to give-up the ghost along alongside the legislative physical care for in addition to alongside the negotiations alongside the European Parliament.

These volition last anything but easy: a rapid overview of the amendments tabled yesteryear the EP Rapporteur Dennis De Jong (LIBE Committee) in addition to yesteryear the other MEPs of the Committee present 2 widely diverging views of what this Directive should last about. LIBE volition vote its “orientation” on Apr xiv in addition to dialogue tin transportation away in addition to then start. So it is equally good early on to say instantly if the EP volition succeed inward enhancing this correct (maybe yesteryear taking inspiration from the Commission’s Recommendation in addition to translating its content into a binding text).

Reblogged from: here) in addition to the Directive on kid suspects' rights has been agreed (see afterward weblog post service here).

NOTES

Annex

FURTHER READING : Sources of the correct to legal aid

The importance of the correct to legal help is linked alongside the correct to an effective remedy in addition to to a fair trial. Indeed equally an ancillary right, it enshrines the regulation of effective judicial protection in addition to the correct to access to justice, which is of top dog importance inward line alongside Human Rights declarations applicable inward Europe.

Because of its ancillary dimension, the abide by for the correct to legal help is provided for inward a number of international instruments of utmost importance. It is guaranteed yesteryear Article xiv (3) of the International Covenant on Civil in addition to Political Rights (ICCPR), in addition to the key principles on which it should last based are outlined inward the UN Principles in addition to Guidelines on Access to Legal Aid inward Criminal Justice Systems adopted on xx Dec 2012 yesteryear the General Assembly.

Article vi (3)(c) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) sets out a “right to legal assistance where the accused has insufficient agency to pay for legal assistance, in addition to to larn complimentary legal help when the involvement of jurist hence requires”.

Concerning the European Union equally such, since the entry into strength of the Treaty of Lisbon, the European Union Charter has saltation the European Union institutions. Yet, Article 47(3) of the European Union Charter of Fundamental rights provides that “legal help shall last made available to those who lack sufficient resources inward hence far equally such help is necessary to ensure effective access to justice”. Even implicitly, the remove to furnish for legal help tin transportation away last drawn from another dispositions of the Charter such equally Art. 48 (2), which states that “Respect for the rights of the defense strength of anyone who has been charged shall last guaranteed”.

Furthermore, the abide by for the correct to legal help guaranteed yesteryear article 47(3) of the European Union Charter has to last understood inward lite of the ECtHR case-law, which contributes to add together to the strict procedural side of legal help a to a greater extent than substantial element, through the requirement of enabling each suspect to acquaint his or her representative properly.

To assess the abide by of this requirement, the ECtHR held inward the representative of Airey v. Ireland that the effectiveness of the correct to access to jurist throughout the correct to complimentary legal help depends generally on whether the private inward inquiry would last able to acquaint his/her representative properly in addition to satisfactorily without the assistance of a lawyer. Circumstances inward which legal representation would last necessary for ensuring access to jurist could last the complexity of the physical care for earlier the courtroom of showtime representative in addition to complexity of the legal points involved. This assessment must also accept into trouble organization human relationship personal circumstances of the applicant in addition to the shape of legal help inward question.
Therefore the correct to legal help tin transportation away last limited equally far equally it is justified yesteryear a legitimate aim in addition to that if at that spot exists a reasonable human relationship of proportionality betwixt the limitation in addition to the legitimate aim sought.

Barnard & Peers: chapter 26

Share this post