For Your Data Daniels V. Williams Illustration Brief
August 12, 2020
Edit
Daniels v. Williams illustration brief summary
474 U.S. 327 (1986)
CASE FACTS
The prisoner sought to recover damages for personal injuries that he sustained when he slipped on a pillow illustration that had been negligently left on a stairway past times the correctional officer. The prisoner's § 1983 claim rested on the disceptation that the officer's negligence deprived the prisoner of his Fourteenth Amendment liberty involvement inwards liberty from bodily injury.
DISCUSSION
The USA Supreme Court held that the prisoner's activity was properly dismissed because a prison theater official's mere lack of due attention did non flora a deprivation of liberty nether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
CONCLUSION
The Court affirmed the judgment of the courtroom of appeals.
474 U.S. 327 (1986)
CASE SYNOPSIS
In an activity that petitioner, a nation prisoner, brought under 42 U.S.C.S. § 1983, the prisoner sought review of a judgment inwards which the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's determination to grant summary judgment inwards favor of respondent, a correctional officer.Baca Juga
CASE FACTS
The prisoner sought to recover damages for personal injuries that he sustained when he slipped on a pillow illustration that had been negligently left on a stairway past times the correctional officer. The prisoner's § 1983 claim rested on the disceptation that the officer's negligence deprived the prisoner of his Fourteenth Amendment liberty involvement inwards liberty from bodily injury.
DISCUSSION
The USA Supreme Court held that the prisoner's activity was properly dismissed because a prison theater official's mere lack of due attention did non flora a deprivation of liberty nether the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
CONCLUSION
The Court affirmed the judgment of the courtroom of appeals.
