For Your Data Filartiga V. Pena-Irala Illustration Brief, 630 F.2D 876 (1980)

Filartiga v. Pena-Irala
630 F.2d 876 (1980)

Alien Tort Statute (ATS) (28 U.S.C. §1350) provides: " the district courts shall accept master copy jurisdiction of whatever civil activity past times an alien for a tort only, committed inward violation of the police pull of nations or of a treaty of the United States."

This police pull was pretty much never used betwixt the fourth dimension it was enacted (1789), as well as during the 1980s.

FACTS
Filartiga was a Paraguayan dissident. Filartiga's boy was tortured as well as murdered past times a Paraguayan official named Pena-Irala (where does 1 larn a cite similar that!?) inward the the world of Paraguay.

• The killing was politically motivated.
• Filartigia tried to larn judge inward Paraguay, was unsuccessful. :(
• Pena-Irala came to the US on vacation, as well as was sued past times Filartiga (who lived inward the US) nether the ATS. (Maybe he volition larn roughly judge now!)

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

• The Trial Court dismissed the claim. Filartiga appealed.
• Trial Court institute that the "law of nations" equally used inward the ATS does non principle a State's handling of its ain citizens.
• The Court was stating that they did non accept jurisdiction over what Paraguayan officials did to Paraguayan citizens on Paraguayan soil.
• Appellate Court reversed: (looks similar he volition larn roughly judge later all!)
• The Appellate Court looked to [The Paquette Habana (175 U.S. 677 (1900))], as well as stated that "the police pull of nations" should live on interpreted equally customary international law.
• The Court institute that nether customary international law, at that spot exists a gear upwardly of "human rights as well as commutation freedoms."
• The Court equally good noted that the extent of those rights as well as freedoms is debatable, but sure enough includes the correct to non to live on tortured as well as killed.
• Official torture is prohibited past times the police pull of nations. (this is a skillful thing!)
• The Court institute that Filartigia genuinely did accept a claim nether the ATS since Pena-Iralia was defendant of violating the police pull of nations.

See also: http://www.mycasebriefs.com/filartiga-v-pena-irala-case-brief-2/

Share this post