For Your Data Cabell V. Chavez-Salido Instance Brief
May 22, 2020
Edit
Cabell v. Chavez-Salido illustration brief summary
454 U.S. 432 (1982)
CASE FACTS
Appellees, lawfully resident aliens, brought an activity against appellants, the County of Los Angeles too for certain of its officials, seeking declaratory too injunctive relief afterwards they were denied positions every mo probation officers because of a statutory citizenship requirement for peace officers contained in Cal. Gov't Code § 1031(a).
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom reversed the judgment declaring unconstitutional appellants' statutory citizenship requirement for peace officers, too the illustration was remanded.
Suggested Study Aids too Books



454 U.S. 432 (1982)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellants, the County of Los Angeles too for certain of its officials, sought review of a determination of a three-judge panel of the USA District Court for the Central District of California, which declared that appellees, lawfully admitted permanent resident aliens, were unconstitutionally excluded from positions every mo put down probation officers yesteryear a statutory citizenship requirement contained in Cal. Gov't Code § 1031(a).Baca Juga
CASE FACTS
Appellees, lawfully resident aliens, brought an activity against appellants, the County of Los Angeles too for certain of its officials, seeking declaratory too injunctive relief afterwards they were denied positions every mo probation officers because of a statutory citizenship requirement for peace officers contained in Cal. Gov't Code § 1031(a).
DISCUSSION
- On appeal from a judgment declaring the statute violated the Equal Protection Clause, U.S. Constitutional amend. XIV, the Supreme Court reversed, noting that land economical restrictions on lawfully resident aliens were dependent plain to heightened judicial scrutiny, such scrutiny was out of house every mo to restrictions that primarily served a political function.
- The Court too therefore applied a two-part evaluation procedure to hit upward one's hear that the challenged restriction served a political rather than economical constituent too that the classification inwards interrogation was sufficiently tailored to accomplish a legitimate political goal, which was to ensure that police describe enforcement hold upward performed yesteryear those having the primal legal bond of citizenship.
- Specifically, a citizenship requirement was held appropriate for probation officers, who had wide ability to practice coercive forcefulness over individuals.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom reversed the judgment declaring unconstitutional appellants' statutory citizenship requirement for peace officers, too the illustration was remanded.
Suggested Study Aids too Books