For Your Data Adkins V. Children’S Infirmary Illustration Brief

Adkins v. Children’s Hospital example brief summary
261 U.S. 525 (1923)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Appellant challenged a Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia conclusion which held that the Act of September 19, 1918, ch. 174, xl Stat. 960, providing a fixed wage for woman someone employees, was an unconstitutional do of nation constabulary ability every bit it interfered amongst project contracts involving individual parties.

Baca Juga

CASE FACTS
Appellant sought review of a lower court's determination that the Act of September 19, 1918 (Act), ch. 174, xl Stat. 960, which fixed minimum payoff for woman someone employees inwards individual employment, was an unconstitutional interference amongst the liberty to contract. The conclusion of the lower courtroom was affirmed on appeal.

DISCUSSION

The U.S. of A. Supreme Court held that the Act interfered amongst U.S. Constitutional Amendment V guaranties, every bit the Act prevented individual employers in addition to employees from bargaining for the best contractual terms.
The Court too held that the wage fixed past times the Act had no relation to the capacity of woman someone employees but, rather, was an invalid do of nation constabulary ability past times attempting to constitute an arbitrary amount necessary to furnish a living for women.
Further, the Act required an employer to brand an arbitrary payment to woman someone employees without whatever causal connection to his delineate of piece of work organisation or the type of hold upwardly the employee performed.

CONCLUSION

The Court affirmed the lower court's decision, belongings that the deed providing fixed minimum payoff for woman someone employees was an unconstitutional interference amongst the liberty to contract every bit the amount had no relation to the type of hold upwardly involved or employee capacity in addition to unjustly prevented bargaining for contractual terms.

Suggested Study Aids in addition to Books