The Reform Of The Full General Court: Unleashing The Forces Of Change

Daniel Sarmiento, Professor of European Union Law at the University Complutense de Madrid*

The reform of the General Court (doubling to 2 judges per Member State inwards 3 stages yesteryear 2019, alongside the parallel abolition of the seven-judge Civil Service Tribunal) is a reality now. The Council as well as the European Parliament conduct hold green-lighted a reform (taking number from Christmas Day) that is destined to move a landmark inwards the history of the EU’s judiciary. For goodness or for worse, the novel General Court, the production of a constitutional reform nether the encompass of a reform of the Court’s Statute, is hither to stay. (For the background to the change, run across comments yesteryear Steve Peers here).

There are many critics of the reform, including some Member States. The supporters seemed to last for a fourth dimension a soundless minority, but they conduct hold successfully convinced the sceptics as well as the European Parliament finally gave way to the many objections beingness brought by MEPs, academics and even some members of the General Court. (For criticism of the change, run across Laurent Pech as well as Alberto Alemanno here as well as here; on the hard negotiations, run across Steve Peers here). As for me, I raised some objections equally to the principles underlying this reform. In a previous postal service I argued that a transformation of the EU’s judiciary similar the 1 nosotros are virtually to run across required a Treaty reform. However, my objection was (and is) not based on the legality of the reform, but on the agency as well as procedures used, which, I believe, produce non reverberate the importance of the measures beingness taken.

But the reform is directly role of our lives as well as nosotros should start learning how to deal alongside it, equally lawyers, equally academics, equally judges or equally civil servants. The Court of Justice of the European Union volition undergo a momentous change, so the quicker nosotros acquire used to it, the better.

The modify volition start, of course, at the General Court itself. Fifty-six judges are a lot of people, as well as they volition for sure non last your average Joe. Fifty-six highly competent lawyers, chosen through a real complex as well as demanding procedure, both political as well as technical, from which non everybody comes last or inwards 1 piece. Fifty-six judges alongside their armies of référendaires, outnumbering yesteryear far the référendaires of the Court of Justice, thus becoming the most numerous professional person community (together alongside jurist-linguists) within the Institution. And despite the huge overall number, it is possible that the power, presence as well as ascendance of each private approximate volition diminish. In a 56-judge jurisdiction, private vox is a rarity. Authority as well as powerfulness volition depend on the powerfulness of each approximate to deed efficiently, non necessarily on their intellectual prestige. In very large houses, housekeepers, not charming armchair thinkers, reign supreme.

Specialised chambers at the General Court volition become a reality, too. There are already plans to conduct hold a sleeping accommodation for staff-cases, but shortly it volition last inevitable for specialised trademark chambers to look too. The haunting myth of a specialised contest sleeping accommodation volition likely last postponed, but if staff as well as trademark specialised chambers move a success, as well as then the door volition last opened upward for farther experiments. IP lawyers volition last happy to take away heed this, but solely if the engagement physical care for industrial plant correctly. If judges cease upward taking turns inwards social club to conduct hold a tell at both the “fun” chambers as well as the “boring” chambers, rotations volition last lethal for coherence as well as expertise. If référendaires cease upward attached to specialised chambers (and non to judges) inwards social club to ensure a sure stability inwards the illustration law, judges mightiness cease upward questioning who is running the place. But if specialised chambers are non an option, who volition trust a jurisdiction with, say, 15 three-judge chambers, to ensure the coherence of the law?

A 56-judge General Court mightiness finally force the Court into giving away its jurisdiction inwards preliminary references procedures inwards some specific areas, equally provided yesteryear Article 256.3 TFEU (the novel rules require a study on this number inwards 2 years’ time). It could brand sense to conduct hold a specialised Community trademark sleeping accommodation also hearing references of interpretation concerning Directive 2008/95, on the approximation of laws of the Member United States relating to merchandise marks. And why non VAT references? The Court of Justice is yet bombarded alongside VAT references from national courts that tin perfectly last handled yesteryear the General Court. The review physical care for would non last dead afterward all, as well as it could last revived inwards social club to guarantee a sure grade of supervision over the General Court’s preliminary rulings. The inertia as well as dynamics of an enlarged General Court mightiness last also powerful to stop, as well as nosotros could soon find ourselves alongside specialised chambers at the General Court hearing preliminary references. I conduct hold no objection to that, but nosotros should last aware of the forces that are beingness awakened yesteryear the current reform.

On a unlike note, the novel General Court volition conduct hold (or it certainly should have) the tools as well as staff to dominion swiftly on a real high number of cases every year. This agency that the appeals on points of constabulary volition skyrocket inwards the years to come. The Court of Justice has taken measures to aspect upward this challenge, as well as inwards the recent years at that topographic point is a clear vogue to brand goodness utilization of Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure. This provision allows the Court of Justice to strike out an appeal yesteryear way of a reasoned social club if it is plainly inadmissible or unfounded. I conduct hold a feeling that this physical care for volition move the measure do when the Court of Justice handles appeals against decisions of the General court, as well as its utilization volition likely develop into a sophisticated type of discretionary remedy. The Court of Justice volition non last able to physical care for the amount of appeals beingness brought yesteryear unhappy parties against decisions of the General Court, as well as thus its do volition move to a greater extent than as well as to a greater extent than principled-oriented. Appeals volition non move a remedy for parties, but a variety of individually-brought review physical care for alongside the role of guaranteeing the unity as well as coherence of European Union Law. In an overburdened appellate court, appeals will not last a remedy to ensure the effective legal protection of private litigants. Once again, I conduct hold no objection to this model (in fact, it exists inwards many Member States), but nosotros should all last aware of its impact. Decisions of the General Court volition involve to last carefully made, because the parties volition hardly conduct hold some other shot earlier the Court of Justice.

This brings me to some other related point: the involve of external command of European Union courts. If straight actions cease upward beingness dealt inwards a single-instance jurisdiction, alongside appeals left solely for principled cases carefully chosen yesteryear the Court of Justice, it volition last essential for the EU to accede to the European Convention of Human Rights. Private parties volition non tolerate a judicial arrangement inwards which crucial decisions for their lives, welfare or property, are solved yesteryear a sole jurisdiction against whom at that topographic point is solely a discretionary appeal. Strasbourg scrutiny volition move crucial if the European Union wants to show that its judiciary is, equally it self-proclaims itself, “a consummate arrangement of legal remedies as well as procedures”. However, the resistance of the Court of Justice to pick out the atmospheric condition of accession to the ECHR volition non assist when, inwards the close future, its appeals move to a greater extent than as well as to a greater extent than principled, as well as the judgments of the General Court to a greater extent than as well as to a greater extent than crucial for litigants. In an ironic twist of fate, the reform of the General Court which was pushed so hard yesteryear the one-time President of the Court, Vassilios Skouris, might cease up becoming the Union’s fast-speed develop towards accession to the ECHR, which Skouris was so concerned about.

Lastly, this reform volition also forcefulness a revision of the Court of Justice of the European Union equally an Institution. So far, it has been clear that the Institution as well as its President were 1 thing, as well as the Court of Justice, the General Court, the Civil Service Court as well as their respective Presidents quite a unlike one. The tensions betwixt the Court of Justice as well as the General Court during the negotiations of the finally reform conduct hold brought to the solar daytime of lite the involve to clear upward who is inwards charge. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 56-judge General Court volition last a real powerful histrion if it always decides to deed inwards unison. The President of the Institution, non of the Court of Justice, could conduct hold a tough fourth dimension trying to notice its ain vox inwards such a crowded house. His colleagues at the Court of Justice are the ones who conduct hold elected him (and to whom he is accountable every 3 years), but he is the President of an Institution that also represents the 56 judges at the General Court. I tin imagine the electrical flow President, a natural consensus-builder, managing successfully to correspond both jurisdictions earlier other Institutions. However, time to come Presidents mightiness non conduct hold the same abilities equally the electrical flow one. If institutional malaise is to last avoided inwards time to come years, serious consideration should last given to the Court’s role equally an Institution.

The reform of the General Court is the kickoff pace inwards the transformation of the EU’s judiciary. It volition unleash the forces of change, whether nosotros similar it or not. But if those forces are wisely managed, it could be the Institution’s run a jeopardy to move the judicial hegemon that many wish the Court to become. Wisdom as well as care, inwards real high doses, will last needed to a greater extent than than always inwards the years to come.

*This postal service previously appeared on the Despite our Differences blog

Barnard & Peers: chapter 10

Photo credit: G. Fessy, CJEU

Share this post