The European Arrest Warrant: The Instance For The Uk To Rest In

Maria Fletcher, Senior Lecturer inwards Law, University of Glasgow, together with Steve Peers, Professor of Law, University of Essex

The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland authorities is currently making its terminal determination on which European Union laws on criminal law together with policing adopted earlier Dec 2009 that it wishes to opt dorsum inwards to, as from 1 Dec 2014. The most controversial determination it has to brand is whether to opt dorsum inwards to the European Arrest Warrant (EAW). In this weblog post, nosotros laid out the representative for opting dorsum inwards to this law.

Background

As role of the Treaty of Lisbon, the Labour Government of the hateful solar daytime secured a rather unique legal opt-out for the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inwards relation to European Union offense together with policing matters, which takes outcome on 1 Dec 2014 together with which is known as the ‘Protocol 36 opt-out’. This was to live on on top of the already secured seat whereby the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland (and Ireland), yesteryear default, does not participate inwards the European Union police force together with criminal jurist (or asylum together with immigration) agenda unless it chooses to opt inwards to private measures on a representative yesteryear representative basis, either during the proposal phase or after their adoption.

The Protocol 36 opt-out, completely unprecedented inwards damage of reach together with only available to the UK, entitles the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland to withdraw en masse from European Union measures concerning police force together with criminal jurist adopted prior to the Lisbon Treaty (1 Dec 2009 to live on precise). In regulation it is an all or cipher opt out inwards the feel that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland must opt out of all of these pre-Lisbon measures, or none at all. But, inwards the lawsuit of its exercise, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland also has the right, inside limits, to opt dorsum inwards to private measures selectively.

The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland Government officially invoked the opt-out (of 130 measures) inwards July 2013 together with simultaneously produced a list of 35 Pre-Lisbon measures it considered to live on inwards the ‘national interest’ to rejoin. The Government so began negotiations with the European Commission together with the Council to seek to rejoin that listing of 35 measures – the damage of the Protocol requiring blessing from ane or other of those institutions depending on the precise nature of the measures. For measures linked to the EU’s ‘Schengen’ rules, such as the Schengen Information System database, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland needs the consent of all Schengen States to opt dorsum in. For other measures (the majority, including the EAW), the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland needs only the consent of the Commission.

According to the Protocol, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland together with the European Union institutions must ‘seek to re-establish the widest possible mensurate of participation of the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inwards the acquis of the Union inwards the expanse of freedom, security together with jurist without seriously affecting the practical operability of the diverse parts thereof, spell respecting their coherence.’ The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is thus probable to live on able to insist on opting dorsum inwards to its chosen measures unless it is opting dorsum inwards to only role of a parcel of measures that are deemed to live on inextricably linked  (the coherence requirement) or it would live on impossible or really hard inwards exercise for technical reasons to opt dorsum inwards to ane mensurate but non some other (the operability requirement).

At the domestic level, scrutiny procedures yesteryear Parliament take hold been thorough, if fraught, due to the Government’s lack of timely information. The relevant committees of both the House of Lords together with the House of Commons take hold conducted inquiries together with produced numerous reports on this affair together with both Houses take hold been promised votes on the overall parcel of measures to rejoin next the conclusion of negotiations with the Commission together with the Council together with on the ground of Impact Assessments. But fourth dimension is running out, especially if the Houses are to live on given plenty fourth dimension to reverberate upon this of import matter.

Although the timetable relating to the Protocol 36 opt-out is solely out of the hands of the electrical flow government, the plainly reality is that the timing could non take hold been worse. With Ukip on the ascent together with ostensibly gaining the world alongside the traditional Tory vote together with straightaway just months away from a full general election, the authorities together with inwards particular, the Conservative party, is seemingly running scared on the theme of Europe.

And ane criminal jurist mensurate inwards item seems to live on fuelling item panic.

The European Arrest Warrant

The EAW has operated inwards the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland for a decade, together with has made it onto the listing of 35 that the Government wishes to rejoin as of 1 Dec 2014. It is without uncertainty the most high-profile together with controversial of the EU’s criminal jurist measures. In essence it provides a unproblematic together with speedy physical care for designed to give upwards people betwixt European Union states for the utilisation of conducting a criminal prosecution or executing a custodial judgement or spell inwards detention.  It plant on the ground of mutual recognition, such that the authorities inwards the Member State inwards receipt of a warrant execute it (arrest together with give upwards the wanted individual) to a greater extent than or less automatically.

This way of cooperating alongside states – which is based on trusting the integrity of some other state’s criminal jurist organisation – was chosen, together with indeed advocated, yesteryear the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland authorities of the time, just because it entailed the to the lowest degree intrusion yesteryear European Union law into domestic systems. Rather, decisions or rulings yesteryear a criminal courtroom inwards the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland must live on accepted together with enforced inwards whatever some other Member State together with vice versa.

It is widely recognised that the EAW has created a to a greater extent than efficient, simpler, quicker, cheaper, to a greater extent than reliable together with less political organisation of extradition inwards Europe compared to its predecessor 1957 European Convention on Extradition (see the House of Lords commission analysis). Since 1 Jan 2004, when the EAW scheme came into force, the average fourth dimension taken to extradite a suspect inwards cases with consent is just 17 days together with inwards non-consensual cases it is has fallen from just about a yr to 48 days. The number of wanted persons surrendered to the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inwards 2013 was 127, compared to nineteen inwards 2004; together with surrendered from the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland upon the asking of all other European Union Member States was 1126 inwards 2013 compared to 24 inwards 2004. Speaking on nine July 2013 the Home Secretary said ‘[s]ince 2009 alone, the arrest warrant has been used to extradite from the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland 57 suspects for nestling sexual practice offences, 86 for rape together with 105 for murder. In the same period, 63 suspects for nestling sexual practice offences, 27 for rape together with 44 for murder were extradited dorsum to Great Britain to appear upwards charges. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 number of these suspects would belike take hold non been extradited dorsum to Great Britain without the arrest warrant.

The success of the EAW mightiness live on illustrated yesteryear the extradition from Italy, inwards less than 8 weeks, of Hussain Osman, who was wanted inwards connectedness with the attempted July 2005 London bombings; he was afterwards sentenced to a minimum term of imprisonment of xl years. More recently, Jeremy Forrest, the instructor who was sentenced inwards June 2013 for absconding to French Republic with ane of his pupils, was extradited dorsum to the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland less than 3 weeks after his arrest.

 

Notwithstanding these positives, the EAW is non beyond criticism together with the most serious ii concerns are considered here. It is worth noting nonetheless that other criticisms of the EAW appearing inwards the populace debate are, frankly, contrived to fuel anti-EU view together with fear. For instance, appall that the EAW tin live on used yesteryear unusual courts to extradite Britons together with inwards unacceptably large numbers is misplaced on ii counts. First, the EAW does indeed require all Member States to give upwards nationals, but different some other Member States, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland had never treated nationality as a bar to extradition anyway. The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland had also removed the obligation of the requested State to demonstrate a prima facie representative inwards honor of extradition requests coming from Europe, far inwards advance of the EAW abolishing the same.

And second, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland may live on beingness required to give upwards increasing numbers of individuals to appear upwards prosecution nether the EAW, but the overwhelming majority (96%) of those are non British nationals – together with presumably, on that ground alone, at that spot would non live on much appetite to maintain them here!

 

Turning so to the ii specially serious criticisms of the EAW.  First, it has resulted inwards a number of British suspects beingness surrendered to countries where they so appear upwards excessive periods inwards prison theatre earlier trial – bail beingness notoriously hard to achieve as a unusual suspect. Any such representative is unhappy together with unacceptable together with it sure fuels the critics who force for the UK’s withdrawal. But alternative options to better the province of affairs attain be together with nosotros would submit that they are preferable to opting-out. For one, the EAW legal musical instrument could live on amended to permit the requested nation to postpone the execution of the warrant until the issuing nation is cook to continue with trial, together with the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland could force for this. Along these lines, recent amendments to United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland law (see farther below) hateful that a suspect volition non live on handed over on the ground of an EAW unless he or she has been charged yesteryear some other Member State.

Another road is to implement an European Union mensurate which specifically tackles this occupation - the so called ‘European Supervision Order’. Adopted inwards 2009, the ESO enables a suspect or accused who has been granted a pre-trial non custodial supervision monastic tell (bail) inwards some other Member State to live on supervised inwards their habitation MS until such fourth dimension as their trial takes place. This musical instrument would allow unusual suspects to live on transferred habitation spell awaiting trial together with equally, United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland nationals to homecoming habitation spell they are on bail. For sensible reasons therefore, this mensurate is amid the 35 instruments which the electrical flow authorities is seeking to opt-back inwards to.

Finally, a longer term way of addressing the EAW occupation is to address its source causes – namely to forcefulness those Member States whose criminal jurist systems are deficient inwards these respects to better the way they care for suspects together with defendants. The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland authorities appears willing to participate partly inwards this agenda to ensure minimum standards of procedural safeguards to those who detect themselves caught upwards inwards the criminal jurist organisation (including victims) across the whole EU. To live on sure, understanding on these issues across Europe is non easy, but it is a mensurate of the flat of commitment to ensuring fairness together with jurist that efforts are made to secure appropriate safeguards together with standards of protection inwards add-on to securing speedy together with effective prosecutions.

In whatever event, anyone who objects to the EAW on the grounds that it sometimes results inwards miscarriages of jurist should hardly live on amid those calling for repeal of the Human Rights Act together with the UK’s withdrawal from the ECHR, given that ane of the principal aims of both these measures is just to avoid miscarriages of justice. But inwards fact, the critics of the EAW are ofttimes also critics of the ECHR.

The minute serious criticism of the EAW is its excessive scope, which enables it to live on used inwards some cases that are trivial, or stale, or both. This causes a headache for United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland law enforcement authorities, who must expend pregnant resources next upwards all warrants, including those for modest offences. This musical instrument was designed with serious crimes together with organized criminality inwards hear together with the absence of a proportionality requirement undermines this – although inwards exercise a permissible ‘human rights’ requirement, which has been enshrined inwards European Investigation Order). The European Parliament has also suggested that the EAW rules should comprise such a dominion (along with many other reforms). This number could also live on addressed yesteryear creating a workable organisation specifically for dealing with minor or so-called ‘disorganised’ criminality committed across borders.

Acknowledging that reform is needed, the Home Secretary has already acted upon her hope to pursue changes at the national flat yesteryear suggestions on the Conservative Home website). While the European Union has negotiated an extradition treaty with Kingdom of Norway together with Iceland, this took years to negotiate together with has non yet entered into forcefulness 8 years after its signature. Furthermore, this treaty is nearly identical to the European Arrest Warrant. So this physical care for is non efficient together with would non gratuitous the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland from compliance with most of the EAW’s rules (which the critics of the EAW organisation dislike so much).

In whatever event, at that spot is no fourth dimension earlier the absolute deadline of 1 Dec for the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland to opt dorsum inwards to the EAW to develop an alternative system. There is straightaway picayune fourth dimension fifty-fifty to depict upwards transitional rules which would regulation the province of affairs if the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland failed to opt dorsum inwards on that date. In the absence of such transitional rules, at that spot volition live on a doubtful legal ground for continuing to arrest, detain or give upwards people who are sought yesteryear the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inwards other Member States or vice versa as of that date.

More generally, having less stringent extradition laws inwards the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland than the ease of the European Union would peril turning the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland into a form of ‘Costa del Crime’, since criminals mightiness live on attracted to come upwards hither inwards low-cal of the relative ease of non beingness extradited. Conversely, the ease of the European Union would travel yesteryear a to a greater extent than attractive bolt-hole for anyone committing crimes inwards the UK, inwards item those who flee to the nation of their nationality together with struggle that they should no longer live on extradited from that State (this was the mutual exercise of continental Member States earlier the EAW was adopted).

It is sure truthful that alarmist press coverage has fuelled a widely held belief that ‘Brussels’ is planning to impose on Europe a single, mutual uniform organisation of criminal justice. This quite just is non the representative inwards together with furthermore, it cannot live on the representative nether the existing legal framework – at that spot is just non the political appetite for this alongside the other 27 fellow member nation governments, who collectively together with for the most role constitute ‘Brussels.’  Even the most potentially ‘intrusive’ European Union criminal law mensurate – the creation of a European Public Prosecutor  - which is soundless at proposal stage, would only live on able to investigate, prosecute together with convey to jurist those involved inwards offences against the Union’s ain fiscal interests. The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland has opted out of this proposal, together with whatever extension of its reach would live on express to ‘serious offense having a cross-border dimension’ together with require the unanimous blessing of all participating Member States together with the European Parliament. 

Concluding remarks

The ‘in/out’ selection that has emerged inwards domestic politics is unsmooth together with dangerous. The hope of a plebiscite along those lines yesteryear 2017 has seemingly laid inwards develop a catamenia of frenzied, mis-leading together with alarmist commentary. This intervention seeks to explicate some of the basic legal facts together with fiction just about the UK’s seat inwards relation to European Union criminal law.

The Article 36 opt-out does non together with cannot rid the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland of the entire European Union criminal law agenda, fifty-fifty inwards the lawsuit that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland Government chose non to exercise its correct to seek to rejoin sure measures.  It cannot just ‘walk away’ from European Union criminal law. Any pre-Lisbon measures amended since 1 Dec 2009 together with whatever novel measures adopted since that engagement are non acre of study to the Protocol 36 opt-out. And the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland has already committed itself to many of these. This legal reality appears to take hold been misunderstood or ignored inwards much of the debate alongside those pushing for the exercise of the opt-out. The fact is that the Protocol 36 opt-out is less nigh repatriating powers from Brussels than nigh degrees of time to come participation inwards a organisation already inwards place. The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is inwards a really privileged seat inwards this feel together with its ongoing willingness to engage inwards this agenda is to live on welcomed inwards the interests of safety, security together with jurist for United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland nationals, if cipher else.

The EAW is yesteryear no agency perfect together with reflection, review together with reform should never live on off the agenda. On residuum nosotros believe it to live on a positive forcefulness together with as such it is preferable to live on ‘in’ it – with a run a peril to shape it – than ‘out’ of it. Much the same goes for the European Union itself.

Europe's leaders take hold late reiterated their full general commitment to accommodating different national positions on integration inwards the EU: ‘Our multifariousness is an asset, our unity brings strength. In our Union, different degrees of cooperation together with integration exist.’ It would seem that at that spot is a existent time to come for fifty-fifty a typically skeptical United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inwards this really modern gild of nations whose aims are to promote peace, the well-being of its peoples together with its values of honor for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, honor for human rights together with the dominion of law.

Barnard & Peers: chapter 2, chapter 25

Share this post