Brexit In Addition To Eu-Uk Merchandise Relations Alongside 3Rd States

‘Our merchandise relations amongst the relaxation of the globe rest unchanged’ (Lord Lawson, 29 February 2016)– or not….

By Dr Markus W. Gehring, Lecturer inwards Law, University of Cambridge*

*Markus teaches European Union External Relations Law, together with is a fellow member of the Centre for European Legal Studies together with a Fellow of the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law. J.S.D. (Yale), LL.M. (Yale), Dr iur (Hamburg), MA (Cantab)

Some Brexit campaigners convey a really cavalier mental attitude to European Union (EU) constabulary inwards full general but recent claims concerning the merchandise relations amongst the relaxation of the globe require some reflection. In the quote higher upwards together with elsewhere they seemed to direct hold argued that nosotros should non travel worried nigh the relaxation of the European Union penalising the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland if it withdrew from the EU, because of continuing World Trade Organisation (WTO) obligations on both sides. However, the UK’s membership inwards the WTO together with all other mixed merchandise agreements (trade treaties which concluded past times both the European Union together with its Member States) could travel inwards peril if the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland exited without a successful transitional understanding amongst the EU.

Since the belatedly 1960s the European Union successively assumed the exclusive competence over what it calls the mutual commercial policy, i.e international trade. This European Union ability does non line organization purely commercial deals, similar the sale of British trains to India; that remains the ability of each Member State. Rather the European Union ability over merchandise deals concerns full general policies similar the tariffs (border taxes on imports) together with authorities regulation that powerfulness travel a barrier to trade.

Some powerfulness inquire why nosotros European Union Member States are non allowed to strike their ain merchandise deals amongst other countries. The ground is quite practical together with non at all some shape of European Union overreach. The exclusive competence over merchandise is a right away number of the European Union existence a customs union, every bit defined past times the WTO. So dissimilar inwards the North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA), members of a customs spousal human relationship tin give the sack no longer laid their ain tariffs or do special bilateral deals amongst other countries. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 production for which the mutual tariff has been paid has the correct to roam freely inwards the entire Union together with of course of report the imposition of private tariffs upon goods past times each Member State would require customs inspections which run counter to the gratis displace of goods together with the unmarried market. To conclude every bit concluded in the Balance of Competence Review past times the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland Department of Business, Skills together with Innovation: “gaining greater command over such relations amongst tertiary countries agency giving upwards benefits of access to the Single Market [in the EU].” (p. 82)

No Freedom of Trade Principle inwards International Law

It maybe should travel noted that in that location is no full general regulation of international constabulary which would allow for gratis merchandise every bit such. The ground nosotros necessitate agreements similar the General Agreement on Tariffs together with Trade (GATT) or the WTO (which at nowadays includes the GATT) is that it is inside each state’s sovereign determination to direct to engage inwards merchandise relations or not. While in that location is a clear economical imperative to do so, states direct hold chosen non to engage inwards international merchandise inwards the past times together with could do so inwards future. The pro-Brexit drive seems to emphasise that United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland trading partners volition direct hold an economical incentive to come upwards to an understanding but they appear to downplay the same economical incentives amongst regards to the EU. In my persuasion in that location is an inherent contradiction inwards their seat because if the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is allowed to create upwards one's withdraw heed ideologically nigh European Union Membership, nosotros tin give the sack safely assume that other countries volition likewise create upwards one's withdraw heed ideologically whether to engage inwards gratis merchandise deals amongst the post-Brexit UK. The vision that French farmers would block roads to forcefulness the European Union to strike a gratis merchandise bargain amongst the post-Brexit United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is quite fanciful given the French farmers full general seat on gratis trade.

EU membership assists merchandise relations amongst non-EU states

While negotiations for a novel multilateral merchandise bargain inwards the WTO scheme direct hold been slow, to a greater extent than states (and the EU) are resorting to bilateral or multilateral merchandise deals. The European Union has concluded trade agreements amongst nigh 50  countries (see map here) together with is negotiating many more.  

Admittedly the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland could belike sign to a greater extent than merchandise deals amongst non-EU countries if it left, but in that location are 2 caveats. First, those deals aren't piece of cake to concur piece maintaining of import protections such every bit a world wellness scheme similar the NHS together with world teaching which are areas for keen liberalisation for other countries. Second, every bit seen from the instance of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), fifty-fifty if the European Union has null to do amongst them, such treaties tin give the sack convey ages to negotiate together with they rest controversial. The Transatlantic Trade together with Investment Partnership (TTIP) betwixt the European Union together with the USA would belike travel a mixed agreement, so the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland would direct hold a veto on it given that it would require ratification past times the UK. Even if the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland left the European Union together with the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland forwent the considerably increased weight that the European Union commands inwards negotiations, the USA would sure as shooting inquire for similar things inwards TTIP from the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland fifty-fifty after Brexit or fifty-fifty more. This assumes that the USA would desire to negotiate one, which USA officials direct hold thence far denied. This likewise so counters the declaration that Brexit could somehow avoid the ‘evil’ TTIP. Indeed, in that location would travel considerably to a greater extent than pressure level on the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland to chop-chop conclude a merchandise bargain together with sensitive areas, especially inwards services, which are liberalised inwards the USA but non inwards the UK, could travel on the table.

Of course of report some existing international agreements that are exclusive to the European Union (ie no Member States are parties to them) would no longer apply to the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inwards the instance of Brexit.[1] This is non only a youngster footnote inwards merchandise relations. Rather, some of these agreements are really sensitive for the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland together with inwards detail for Scotland. For instance the 'Scotch whisky' shout out is protected inwards Annex IV of the EC/Canada agreement on merchandise inwards wines together with spirits, to which no European Union Member States are parties. Even to a greater extent than of import is the equivalent understanding amongst the USA, which constitutes the number i marketplace seat for Scotch whisky. The EU/South Africa agreement covers some other key market. Risking the continuation of these agreements could travel hugely detrimental for the UK.

WTO Membership

The European Union is a founding fellow member of the World Trade Organisation (1 Jan 1995) together with really nearly could direct hold completely replaced its Member States if the Court of Justice inwards Opinion 1/94 had non decided that the in conclusion WTO Agreement together with its subsequent understanding were mixed agreements inwards which both the European Union together with its Member States jointly exercise their competences. Claiming that the European Union only represents its Member States every bit it does inwards other international fora is completely incorrect together with ignores the fact that the European Union has the exclusive competence over mutual commercial policy (Art. iii TFEU). Or lay differently, Lord Lawson inwards this interview misinformed the public. He claimed that the all United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland merchandise relationships amongst the relaxation of the globe would rest unchanged together with he had ‘no incertitude nigh it’. WTO Membership is economically together with geopolitically of import because the organization has 162 Member States.

But what nigh the claim past times Brexiteers that United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland merchandise relations amongst the relaxation of the globe rest unchanged. To clarify the obvious – Lord Lawson’s assessment the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland could only travel along to convey business office inwards existing merchandise (and new!) deals if it left the European Union has no ground inwards the law. Rather, he inadvertently highlighted some other potential uncertainty for the UK. Brexit could forcefulness the renegotiation of the price of the UK’s WTO Membership. This is non a instance of treaty succession every bit both entities (the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland together with EU) retain their international legal personality after Brexit. So this is quite dissimilar to the discussions of treaty membership for Scotland because Scotland, dissimilar the UK, is non currently a political party to international treaties inwards its ain name.

Commentators direct hold highlighted that “[a]ssuming the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland does non larn into into a customs spousal human relationship amongst the European Union after its withdrawal, it would no longer travel business office of the mutual [tariff] schedules. In this scenario, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland must submit its ain novel schedules after the conclusion of an travel out understanding amongst the European Union if it is to rest a WTO member. These schedules necessitate to travel accepted past times all other WTO members inwards consensus together with certified next sure procedures, which powerfulness create difficulties.”[2]

While continued WTO membership of the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland every bit such powerfulness non travel doubtful, it would direct hold to extensively renegotiate its ain tariff commitments, which has proven hard fifty-fifty for of import trading nations such every bit Russian Federation together with China. Some other WTO members who powerfulness direct hold an involvement inwards exerting special liberalisation commitments from the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland powerfulness fifty-fifty consider a non-violation electrical charge against the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland upon Brexit. This type of electrical charge is possible, fifty-fifty if no understanding has been violated, but if some other WTO fellow member feels that a authorities activity or specific province of affairs deprived it of an expected benefit. This is peculiarly sensitive for the GATS schedules (which line organization merchandise inwards services) where farther liberalisation pressure level powerfulness travel exerted past times the UK’s trading partners.

Even if nosotros leave of absence European Union constabulary aside together with persuasion the affair from a world international constabulary perspective, renegotiation of the price of the UK’s WTO membership is inevitable. While the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland together with the European Union both relish international legal personality together with the mere composition of the latter changes, this does non hateful that international treaties together with United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland membership inwards international organisations such every bit the WTO rest wholly unaffected. While automatic final result of that membership nether this perspective seems to travel a flake far-fetched, the necessitate for extensive renegotiations may yet arise. The ground is a really unproblematic one. The United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland cannot accolade its obligations nether these agreements without existence business office of the European Union unmarried market. WTO membership entails extensive liberalisation commitments which are premised on the fact that the imported goods tin give the sack roam freely inwards the Union together with are treated every bit European Union goods i time customs has been cleared. 

Under this perspective the UK’s continued WTO membership every bit such is non doubtful but the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland lone cannot fulfill all the obligations that the EC (now the EU) entered into on behalf of its so Member States. This would require at the really to the lowest degree a carve upwards submission of a tariff schedule which could travel dependent area to negotiations amongst all other WTO Members. Even if the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland only copied together with pasted the existing tariff commitments of the EU, the formal human activity of re-issuing the schedule could give rising to negotiations.

FTAs

If the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland left the European Union inwards an unorderly fashion, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is unlikely, reverse to what was claimed inwards the in conclusion Economist, to travel able to conclude merchandise agreements amongst existing European Union Member States. The EU’s exclusive competence over unusual merchandise would likewise apply to negotiations betwixt say Federal Republic of Federal Republic of Germany together with the UK. So fifty-fifty if High German machine makers direct hold a huge involvement inwards a merchandise bargain amongst the UK, other countries powerfulness not. 

EU Member States are non gratis to conclude merchandise agreements unilaterally which autumn inside the exclusive competence of the Union.  While it is unlikely that European Union would non desire continuing merchandise relations amongst the UK, such continuation is far from automatic. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 solid understanding of European Union external relations constabulary (as for the interrogation of the legal bindingness of the Tusk Brexit Deal) is necessary for this analysis.

Even the European Economic Area (the EEA: the understanding on access to the unmarried market, betwixt the EU, Norway, Republic of Iceland together with Liechtenstein) is explicitly only opened upwards to European Union Member States together with European Free Trade Area (EFTA) states. This agency that the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland would direct hold to bring together EFTA together with so apply to bring together the EEA, according to the accession clause inwards the EEA Treaty. It should likewise travel highlighted that every bit a fellow member of the EEA many European Union legislative acts are applicable (try searching EEA relevance inwards Eur-Lex, the European Union constabulary database) together with EEA states direct hold no discretion every bit to whether they participate or non if they desire to keep marketplace seat access inwards that detail sector. In many ways the EFTA Court prepare to dominion on the EEA understanding has been fifty-fifty to a greater extent than liberal inwards its gratis displace of persons jurisprudence than the Court of Justice which powerfulness non travel inwards the involvement of those proposing Brexit.

In other words, if the European Union wanted to brand life hard for the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inwards merchandise relations (the Foreign Secretary called it showing the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland a rude gesture), it could. Active European Union resistance powerfulness non brand whatever economical sense but so in that location direct hold been a twosome of political decisions inwards the European Union that were reverse to conventional economical wisdom recently. The idea that French farmers would demonstrate together with block roads inwards guild to actively achieve a Free Trade Agreement amongst the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland (as suggested past times Chris Grayling (at 2h36min) is absolutely illusionary together with only displays that fifty-fifty the electrical current Leader inwards the House of Commons does non empathize French politics. 

Even where both the European Union together with the Member States (including the UK) are Parties to an understanding (like for the WTO or the bulk of existing European Union Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)) merchandise relations of the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland are really probable to change. In other words it tin give the sack travel argued that mixed agreements concluded past times the European Union together with its Member States could travel dependent area to automatic final result every bit far every bit the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is concerned. [3] Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 legal ground could travel the provision which determines the application of the understanding inwards question. Some FTAs comprise a clause which defines Parties every bit Member States of the EU. This could telephone phone the continued participation past times the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inwards such an FTA into question.[4] There are likewise clauses which determine the territorial orbit of these FTAs. For instance Article 360 of the Association Agreement between European Union together with Central American States restricts the application of the understanding to countries, inwards which the European Union Treaties apply together with i time to a greater extent than this could telephone phone the continued application of these treaties to the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland into question.[5] In whatever instance the tertiary solid ground volition direct hold the correct to terminate its merchandise human relationship amongst the UK.[6]  So “[w]hilst the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is a political party to such agreements, the rights which it has enjoyed nether their provisions, every bit good every bit the obligations it has assumed, would non travel along to apply automatically. For instance, mixed agreements may travel of an essentially bilateral nature. This is suggested past times both their context together with wording.  It has likewise been affirmed past times the Court which, inwards European Development Fund, held that the Lomé Convention betwixt the European Union together with its Member States together with African, Caribbean Area together with Pacific states ‘established an essentially bilateral ACP-EEC cooperation’” [omitting footnotes][7].

It likewise has to travel highlighted that it is at nowadays do inwards the European Union to provisionally apply mixed-agreement-FTAs every bit regards the European Union (as distinct from its Member States). So piece the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland already derives merchandise benefits from those agreements past times virtue of its European Union membership, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland is non fifty-fifty a political party to them yet until all European Union Member States direct hold ratified them. Since it is non yet a political party to those agreements, it manifestly could non remain a political party to them after Brexit. This applies to the EU’s FTAs amongst Peru together with Colombia, Central America, Eastern together with Southern African States, Cameroon, to a greater extent than Southern African States, together with most Caribbean countries,

For all FTAs the correct for non-EU countries to asking re-negotiations either amongst the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland lone or amongst both the European Union together with the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland separately arises. The non-EU countries powerfulness non direct hold a right away economical incentive to re-negotiate merchandise deals together with the EU, the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland together with the trading partner could only amicably meliorate the FTAs to reverberate the different condition of the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland inwards such an arrangement. This would travel the best instance scenario but it volition silent require negotiations together with a lot of skilful volition on the side of the trading partners including the European Union together with all its remaining Member States.

Some direct hold argued that the regulation of continuity inwards the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties would militate against whatever finding of automatic final result or re-negotiation.[8] While the regulation of continuity was mainly designed for province succession together with changes inwards government, it cannot travel applied inwards this situation. Where the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland tin give the sack no longer fulfill obligations nether these treaties past times virtue of having left the Single Market, automatic continuity cannot travel assumed.

Another ground why renewed negotiations powerfulness travel necessary is the concept of fundamentally changed circumstance, which is likewise referred to inwards the Vienna Convention. Reliance on this regulation of world international constabulary past times smaller trading nations inwards the WTO would fail, because it would only give them the correct to terminate the WTO treaty, which is non inwards their interest.[9] However the European Union together with its Member States could belike invoke the concept vis-à-vis the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland together with terminate their FTA relationships exterior the WTO context.

As nosotros tin give the sack encounter fifty-fifty the most favourable scenario for the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland involves enough of goodwill (and belike economical concessions past times the UK) on all sides. The continuation of bilateral merchandise deals would depend on both European Union together with the tertiary solid ground trading partner together with non the United Kingdom of Great Britain together with Northern Ireland involvement alone, so quite the opposite of “trade relations amongst the relaxation of the globe rest unchanged”. 

Barnard & Peers: chapter 25

Photo credit: commons.wikimedia.org

---

[1] See Panos Koutrakos “Editorial - Brexit together with international treaty-making” [2016] European Law Review 1

[2] Ibid. p. 54.

[3] Katrin Fernekeß, Solveiga Palevičienė together with Manu Thadikkaran “The Future Of The Great Britain In Europe - Exit Scenarios And Their Implications On Trade Relations” Graduate Institute Trade together with Investment Law Clinic Papers, 2013, 07 Jan 2014, Geneva, online: Tohttp://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/ctei/shared/CTEI/working_papers/CTEI_2013-01_LawClinic_FutureUKinEurope.pdf

[4] Ibid. p. 49

[5] Ibid. p. 50. 

[6] Ibid. p. 50.

[7] Panos Koutrakos “Editorial - Brexit together with international treaty-making” [2016] European Law Review 1.

[8] The relevant ILC Report stated really clearly (http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_120.pdf): “In consequence, the treaty obligation, i time assumed past times or on behalf of the State, is non affected, inwards abide by of its international validity or operative force, past times whatever of the next circumstances: (a) That in that location has been a alter of authorities or regime inwards whatever State political party to the treaty; (b) That some detail organ of the State (whether executive, administrative, legislative or judicial) is responsible for whatever breach of the treaty; (c) That a diminution inwards the assets of the State, or territorial changes affecting the extent of the surface area of the State past times loss or transfer of territory (but non affecting its existence or identity every bit a State), direct hold occurred, unless the treaty itself specifically relates to the detail assets or territory concerned. In all such cases, the treaty obligation remains internationally valid, together with the State volition incur responsibleness for whatever failure to acquit it out.”

[9] Many thank y'all to Dr Michael Waibel for highlighting this point. 

Share this post