For Your Data Strickland V. Washington Instance Brief
November 29, 2020
Edit
Strickland v. Washington illustration brief summary
466 U.S. 668 (1984)
CASE SYNOPSIS:
The respondent inwards this illustration sought to review the Court of Appeal's judgment for the 11th circuit.
The respondent argued that his expiry judgement should accept been overturned.
He stated that the "strategic decisions upon which he was advised past times his attorney that took house during his trial" were plenty to constitute an ineffective assistance of counsel that was inwards violation of his correct to counsel nether the 4th amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
HOLDING:
Death judgement affirmed.
DISCUSSION
The Supreme Court also caput that inwards guild to exhibit an attorney's assistance was defective plenty to ask a reversal of a expiry sentence, the respondent should endure able to exhibit that the counsel's surgery was deficient.
The deficient surgery must accept inwards fact prejudiced the defence
ANALYSIS:
When applying the to a higher house standard, the Court stated that the counsel's surgery could non endure held to endure unreasonable.
Even if the surgery was unreasonable, hither in that place was no insufficient prejudice that would warrant setting aside the expiry sentence.
The respondent failed to exhibit that his sentencing proceeding was inwards whatsoever agency fundamentally unfair.
OUTCOME:
The courtroom affirmed the respondent's expiry sentence.
The respondent's counsel's surgery could non endure constitute unreasonable.
Even if it was unreasonable, the respondent had non suffered the sort of prejudice that would warrant setting aside his expiry sentence.
---
Interested inwards learning how to transcend the superlative grades inwards your constabulary schoolhouse classes? Want to larn how to report smarter than your competition? Interested inwards transferring to a high ranked school?
466 U.S. 668 (1984)
CASE SYNOPSIS:
The respondent inwards this illustration sought to review the Court of Appeal's judgment for the 11th circuit.
The respondent argued that his expiry judgement should accept been overturned.
He stated that the "strategic decisions upon which he was advised past times his attorney that took house during his trial" were plenty to constitute an ineffective assistance of counsel that was inwards violation of his correct to counsel nether the 4th amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
HOLDING:
Death judgement affirmed.
DISCUSSION
The Supreme Court also caput that inwards guild to exhibit an attorney's assistance was defective plenty to ask a reversal of a expiry sentence, the respondent should endure able to exhibit that the counsel's surgery was deficient.
The deficient surgery must accept inwards fact prejudiced the defence
ANALYSIS:
When applying the to a higher house standard, the Court stated that the counsel's surgery could non endure held to endure unreasonable.
Even if the surgery was unreasonable, hither in that place was no insufficient prejudice that would warrant setting aside the expiry sentence.
The respondent failed to exhibit that his sentencing proceeding was inwards whatsoever agency fundamentally unfair.
OUTCOME:
The courtroom affirmed the respondent's expiry sentence.
The respondent's counsel's surgery could non endure constitute unreasonable.
Even if it was unreasonable, the respondent had non suffered the sort of prejudice that would warrant setting aside his expiry sentence.
---
Interested inwards learning how to transcend the superlative grades inwards your constabulary schoolhouse classes? Want to larn how to report smarter than your competition? Interested inwards transferring to a high ranked school?