For Your Data Vincent V. Lake Erie Shipping Co. Illustration Brief
October 30, 2020
Edit
Vincent v. Lake Erie Transportation Co. case brief
124 N.W. 221 (Minn. 1910)
SYNOPSIS:
Appeal from judgment of the District Court for St. Louis (Minnesota), which denied accused shipping owner's displace for a directed verdict together with entered a jury verdict inwards favor of plaintiff dock owners, inwards plaintiffs' activity to recover for harm to their wharf allegedly caused past times defendant's negligence.
OVERVIEW: Plaintiffs owned a wharf inwards which ships docked to unload cargo. Defendant owned a shipping that docked at plaintiffs' wharf during a storm. During the storm, plaintiffs' wharf was damaged past times defendant's ship. Plaintiffs brought an activity against accused to recover for the damages to their wharf. The trial courtroom denied defendant's displace for a directed verdict together with entered judgment inwards favor of plaintiffs, together with denied defendant's displace for a novel trial.
HOLDING:
On appeal, the terra firma supreme courtroom affirmed, reasoning the harm to plaintiffs' wharf was non caused past times an deed of God, which would convey excused defendant's liability, precisely was an injury caused past times the defendant's prudent intention to usage plaintiffs' holding for the role of preserving its ain to a greater extent than valuable property, together with the plaintiffs, therefore, were entitled to compensation for the injury done.
RULES:
Where the province of affairs is 1 inwards which the ordinary rules regulating holding rights are suspended past times forces beyond human control, together with if, without the straight intervention of roughly deed past times the 1 sought to locomote held liable, the holding of roughly other is injured, such injury must locomote attributed to the deed of God, together with non to the wrongful deed of the someone sought to locomote charged.
OUTCOME: Judgment of district courtroom affirmed, because where injury was inflicted because accused prudently together with advisedly availed itself of the plaintiff's holding for the role of preserving its ain to a greater extent than valuable property, the plaintiffs were entitled to compensation for the injury done.
---
Interested inwards learning how to acquire the peak grades inwards your police delineate schoolhouse classes? Want to larn how to report smarter than your competition? Interested inwards transferring to a high ranked school?
-->
124 N.W. 221 (Minn. 1910)
SYNOPSIS:
Appeal from judgment of the District Court for St. Louis (Minnesota), which denied accused shipping owner's displace for a directed verdict together with entered a jury verdict inwards favor of plaintiff dock owners, inwards plaintiffs' activity to recover for harm to their wharf allegedly caused past times defendant's negligence.
OVERVIEW: Plaintiffs owned a wharf inwards which ships docked to unload cargo. Defendant owned a shipping that docked at plaintiffs' wharf during a storm. During the storm, plaintiffs' wharf was damaged past times defendant's ship. Plaintiffs brought an activity against accused to recover for the damages to their wharf. The trial courtroom denied defendant's displace for a directed verdict together with entered judgment inwards favor of plaintiffs, together with denied defendant's displace for a novel trial.
HOLDING:
On appeal, the terra firma supreme courtroom affirmed, reasoning the harm to plaintiffs' wharf was non caused past times an deed of God, which would convey excused defendant's liability, precisely was an injury caused past times the defendant's prudent intention to usage plaintiffs' holding for the role of preserving its ain to a greater extent than valuable property, together with the plaintiffs, therefore, were entitled to compensation for the injury done.
RULES:
Where the province of affairs is 1 inwards which the ordinary rules regulating holding rights are suspended past times forces beyond human control, together with if, without the straight intervention of roughly deed past times the 1 sought to locomote held liable, the holding of roughly other is injured, such injury must locomote attributed to the deed of God, together with non to the wrongful deed of the someone sought to locomote charged.
OUTCOME: Judgment of district courtroom affirmed, because where injury was inflicted because accused prudently together with advisedly availed itself of the plaintiff's holding for the role of preserving its ain to a greater extent than valuable property, the plaintiffs were entitled to compensation for the injury done.
---
Interested inwards learning how to acquire the peak grades inwards your police delineate schoolhouse classes? Want to larn how to report smarter than your competition? Interested inwards transferring to a high ranked school?
-->