For Your Data Fisher V. Jackson Illustration Brief
October 30, 2020
Edit
Fisher v. Jackson illustration brief summary
FACTS:
-Fisher was hired every bit a reporter past times the defendant’s managing editor at a paper together with was allow become five years later.
-He got the project past times responding to an promotion past times the paper looking for a
newsman – to which the plaintiff responded – he was interviewed together with he took the
job.
-This illustration is an employee's activity against employer for breach of work contract.
-The plaintiff (Fisher) alleged that the he was induced (by Jackson, the defendant) to surrender his project together with possess got a novel project together with inwards furnish he would possess got lifetime work – non dependent area to termination. Fisher contends that he entered into the oral work contract amongst Jackson together with that he suffered a detriment past times giving upwardly his job.
ISSUE:
Whether sufficient consideration was given on the live on of the plaintiff that would brand the work contract binding?
HOLDING: It did non appear that employer had encouraged or induced employee to acquire out previous employment, employee's activity inwards leaving previous work was non sufficient consideration for an alleged contract of life employment.
ANALYSIS:
The negotiations for the project amounted to naught to a greater extent than than the hiring of a project that was permanent inwards the feel that it wasn't only temporary.
-The hiring was indefinite every bit to fourth dimension together with terminable past times either political party at his will.
---
Interested inwards learning how to acquire the peak grades inwards your police schoolhouse classes? Want to acquire how to study smarter than your competition? Interested inwards transferring to a high ranked school?
-->
FACTS:
-Fisher was hired every bit a reporter past times the defendant’s managing editor at a paper together with was allow become five years later.
-He got the project past times responding to an promotion past times the paper looking for a
newsman – to which the plaintiff responded – he was interviewed together with he took the
job.
-This illustration is an employee's activity against employer for breach of work contract.
-The plaintiff (Fisher) alleged that the he was induced (by Jackson, the defendant) to surrender his project together with possess got a novel project together with inwards furnish he would possess got lifetime work – non dependent area to termination. Fisher contends that he entered into the oral work contract amongst Jackson together with that he suffered a detriment past times giving upwardly his job.
ISSUE:
Whether sufficient consideration was given on the live on of the plaintiff that would brand the work contract binding?
HOLDING: It did non appear that employer had encouraged or induced employee to acquire out previous employment, employee's activity inwards leaving previous work was non sufficient consideration for an alleged contract of life employment.
ANALYSIS:
The negotiations for the project amounted to naught to a greater extent than than the hiring of a project that was permanent inwards the feel that it wasn't only temporary.
-The hiring was indefinite every bit to fourth dimension together with terminable past times either political party at his will.
---
Interested inwards learning how to acquire the peak grades inwards your police schoolhouse classes? Want to acquire how to study smarter than your competition? Interested inwards transferring to a high ranked school?
-->