For Your Data Arrowsmith V. Commissioner Example Brief
October 29, 2020
Edit
Arrowsmith v. Commissioner illustration brief summary
344 U.S. half-dozen (1952)
SYNOPSIS:
Petitioner taxpayers sought review of a judgment of the United States of America Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, reversing a judgment of the revenue enhancement courtroom as well as asset that a loss arising from the affairs of a liquidated corporation whose assets were transferred to petitioners was to endure classified every 2d a uppercase loss every 2d opposed to an ordinary concern loss.
OVERVIEW: Petitioner taxpayers decided to liquidate as well as split the proceeds of a corporation. Petitioners reported profits obtained from distributions of uppercase every 2d uppercase gains. Subsequent to liquidation, petitioners were required to pay a judgment arising from the affairs of the "old" liquidated corporation; they classified the loss every 2d an ordinary concern loss as well as obtained a greater deduction than if a uppercase loss had been taken. Respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue viewed the payment every 2d purpose of the master liquidation of the corporation as well as classified it every 2d a uppercase loss. The revenue enhancement courtroom disagreed as well as institute it to endure an ordinary concern loss.
HOLDING:
The courtroom of appeals reversed as well as reclassified the loss every 2d capital.
-The United States of America Supreme Court held that I.R.C. § 23 treated losses from sales or exchanges of uppercase assets every 2d "capital losses," which included liquidation distributions handled pursuant to I.R.C. § 115.
ANALYSIS:
-The Court as well as thus affirmed upon the determination that petitioners' losses cruel squarely into the category of uppercase loss.
-The 2 individual's liabilities were non based on whatsoever ordinary concern transaction of theirs, simply entirely because they were the transferees of the corporation's assets.
-The Court noted that if the judgment had been paid inwards the same twelvemonth that the 2 individuals split upward the corporation, as well as thus the payments would own got diminished the uppercase make that they received.
OUTCOME: The Court affirmed the judgment, asset that petitioners' losses inwards relation to a corporation, whose assets had been liquidated as well as transferred to them, were uppercase losses every 2d opposed to ordinary concern losses despite the fact that they occurred subsequent to the transfer. This was thus because the Internal Revenue Code treated losses from exchanges of uppercase assets, such every 2d liquidation distributions, every 2d "capital losses."
---
Interested inwards learning how to acquire the acme grades inwards your police pull schoolhouse classes? Want to larn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested inwards transferring to a high ranked school?
-->
344 U.S. half-dozen (1952)
SYNOPSIS:
Petitioner taxpayers sought review of a judgment of the United States of America Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, reversing a judgment of the revenue enhancement courtroom as well as asset that a loss arising from the affairs of a liquidated corporation whose assets were transferred to petitioners was to endure classified every 2d a uppercase loss every 2d opposed to an ordinary concern loss.
OVERVIEW: Petitioner taxpayers decided to liquidate as well as split the proceeds of a corporation. Petitioners reported profits obtained from distributions of uppercase every 2d uppercase gains. Subsequent to liquidation, petitioners were required to pay a judgment arising from the affairs of the "old" liquidated corporation; they classified the loss every 2d an ordinary concern loss as well as obtained a greater deduction than if a uppercase loss had been taken. Respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue viewed the payment every 2d purpose of the master liquidation of the corporation as well as classified it every 2d a uppercase loss. The revenue enhancement courtroom disagreed as well as institute it to endure an ordinary concern loss.
HOLDING:
The courtroom of appeals reversed as well as reclassified the loss every 2d capital.
-The United States of America Supreme Court held that I.R.C. § 23 treated losses from sales or exchanges of uppercase assets every 2d "capital losses," which included liquidation distributions handled pursuant to I.R.C. § 115.
ANALYSIS:
-The Court as well as thus affirmed upon the determination that petitioners' losses cruel squarely into the category of uppercase loss.
-The 2 individual's liabilities were non based on whatsoever ordinary concern transaction of theirs, simply entirely because they were the transferees of the corporation's assets.
-The Court noted that if the judgment had been paid inwards the same twelvemonth that the 2 individuals split upward the corporation, as well as thus the payments would own got diminished the uppercase make that they received.
OUTCOME: The Court affirmed the judgment, asset that petitioners' losses inwards relation to a corporation, whose assets had been liquidated as well as transferred to them, were uppercase losses every 2d opposed to ordinary concern losses despite the fact that they occurred subsequent to the transfer. This was thus because the Internal Revenue Code treated losses from exchanges of uppercase assets, such every 2d liquidation distributions, every 2d "capital losses."
---
Interested inwards learning how to acquire the acme grades inwards your police pull schoolhouse classes? Want to larn how to study smarter than your competition? Interested inwards transferring to a high ranked school?
-->