For Your Data Lemon V. Kurtzman Representative Brief
August 17, 2020
Edit
Lemon v. Kurtzman case brief summary
403 U.S. 602 (1971)
CASE FACTS
Pa. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, §§ 5601 - 5609 (Supp. 1971) provided fiscal back upwards to nonpublic simple as well as secondary schools past times reimbursing the toll of teachers' salaries, textbooks, as well as instructional materials inwards specified secular subjects. Pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws Ann. § 16-51-1 et seq. (Supp. 1970), the solid reason paid remove to teachers inwards nonpublic simple schools a supplement of xv pct of their annual salary. Under each statute, solid reason assistance had been given to church-related educational institutions. The courtroom held that both statutes were unconstitutional, affirming the Rhode Island District Court's decision that the Act fostered excessive entanglement betwixt authorities as well as religion, equally evident inwards the means the plan required the authorities to assay out a school's records to own upwards one's heed how much of the full expenditures was attributable to secular instruction as well as how much to religious activity.
DISCUSSION
The courtroom reversed the Pennsylvania District Court gild that dismissed appellant taxpayers' electrical load nether a Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion, finding that the Pennsylvania statute had the facial defect of providing solid reason fiscal assistance remove to church-related schools.
CONCLUSION
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Rhode Island District Court, as well as reversed as well as remanded the judgment of the Pennsylvania District Court.
403 U.S. 602 (1971)
CASE SYNOPSIS
In a consolidated instance from the U.S.A. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, as well as from the U.S.A. District Court for the District of Rhode Island, appellant citizens as well as taxpayers challenged solid reason statutes that provided assistance to church-related simple as well as secondary schools equally violative of the Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.CASE FACTS
Pa. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, §§ 5601 - 5609 (Supp. 1971) provided fiscal back upwards to nonpublic simple as well as secondary schools past times reimbursing the toll of teachers' salaries, textbooks, as well as instructional materials inwards specified secular subjects. Pursuant to R.I. Gen. Laws Ann. § 16-51-1 et seq. (Supp. 1970), the solid reason paid remove to teachers inwards nonpublic simple schools a supplement of xv pct of their annual salary. Under each statute, solid reason assistance had been given to church-related educational institutions. The courtroom held that both statutes were unconstitutional, affirming the Rhode Island District Court's decision that the Act fostered excessive entanglement betwixt authorities as well as religion, equally evident inwards the means the plan required the authorities to assay out a school's records to own upwards one's heed how much of the full expenditures was attributable to secular instruction as well as how much to religious activity.
DISCUSSION
The courtroom reversed the Pennsylvania District Court gild that dismissed appellant taxpayers' electrical load nether a Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) motion, finding that the Pennsylvania statute had the facial defect of providing solid reason fiscal assistance remove to church-related schools.
CONCLUSION
The Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the Rhode Island District Court, as well as reversed as well as remanded the judgment of the Pennsylvania District Court.