For Your Data Ebay, Inc. V. Mercexchange, Llc Illustration Brief
April 26, 2020
Edit
eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC example brief summary
547 U.S. 388 (2006)
DISCUSSION
The judgment of the courtroom of appeals was vacated. The example was remanded for farther proceedings.
Suggested Study Aids in addition to Books



547 U.S. 388 (2006)
CASE SYNOPSIS
In a patent infringement suit, a jury found that respondent patent holder's patent was valid, that petitioner Web site operators had infringed that patent, in addition to that an accolade of damages was appropriate. The U.S.A. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia denied the holder's motility for permanent injunctive relief. The U.S.A. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit reversed. The Supreme Court granted certiorari.DISCUSSION
- According to well-established principles of equity, a plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction had to satisfy a four-factor examination earlier a courtroom could bring granted such relief.
- The Supreme Court found that these familiar principles applied amongst equal forcefulness to disputes arising nether the Patent Act.
- A major difference from the long tradition of equity do should non bring been lightly implied. Nothing inwards the Patent Act indicated that Congress intended such a departure.
- To the contrary, the Patent Act expressly provided that injunctions could bring issued inwards accordance amongst the principles of equity, under 35 U.S.C.S. § 283.
- This approach was consistent amongst the Supreme Court's handling of injunctions nether the Copyright Act.
- Neither the district courtroom nor the courtroom of appeals fairly applied these traditional equitable principles inwards deciding the holder's motility for a permanent injunction.
- The determination whether to grant or deny injunctive relief rested inside the equitable discretion of the district courts, in addition to such discretion had to hold upward exercised consistent amongst traditional principles of equity, inwards patent disputes no less than inwards other cases governed yesteryear such standards.
The judgment of the courtroom of appeals was vacated. The example was remanded for farther proceedings.
Suggested Study Aids in addition to Books