For Your Data Corning Drinking Glass Plant V. Sumitomo Electrical Usa, Inc. Representative Brief

Corning Glass Works v. Sumitomo Electric USA, Inc. case brief summary
868 F.2d 1251 (1989)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Defendants appealed from the the States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which flora defendants liable for patent infringement.

CASE FACTS
The courtroom flora defendants liable for infringement of claims of the States Patent No. '915 as well as of the States Patent No. '550, all directed to the construction of optical waveguide fibers. Defendants challenged the validity of both patents as well as the finding of infringement of the '915 patent. Plaintiff cross-appealed from the asset that accused did non infringe simply about other of its patents.

DISCUSSION

• On appeal, the courtroom affirmed the judgment. 
• The courtroom was unpersuaded of legal or factual mistake inwards the district court's finding that the '915 claims were non anticipated past times a prior fine art patent. 
• The '550 project design was non proven invalid under 35 U.S.C.S. § 102(b) and § 103. 
• The courtroom was likewise unpersuaded of mistake inwards the district court's finding of infringement of the inventions of claims of the '915 patent, since the finding of equivalence was non clearly erroneous, as well as rejected the arguments on cross-appeal.

CONCLUSION
On appeal, the courtroom affirmed the judgment. The courtroom was unpersuaded of mistake inwards the district court's finding of infringement of the inventions, as well as flora that the patents were valid.

Suggested Study Aids as well as Books

Share this post