For Your Data Republic V. Emmons Illustration Brief
March 18, 2020
Edit
Commonwealth v. Emmons illustration brief summary
43 A.2d 568 (1945)
CASE FACTS
Defendant possessed a vehicle nether a bailment lease. She was ii months behind inwards payments. The victim together with roughly other worker sought to repossess the vehicle inwards wide daylight, acre keeping the peace. Defendant shot together with seriously injured the victim equally he was assisting inwards the towing of the vehicle. Defendant contended that she was justified inwards shooting the victim because she idea he was committing a felony past times taking her vehicle.
DISCUSSION
The courtroom affirmed the lawsuit court's judgment that convicted accused of aggravated assail together with battery.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law
43 A.2d 568 (1945)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Defendant was charged amongst assail together with battery amongst intent to murder, aggravated assail together with battery, together with unproblematic assail together with battery. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 jury inwards the Quarter Sessions Court, Delaware County, Pennsylvania, establish accused guilty of aggravated assail together with battery. The lawsuit courtroom overruled defendant's displace for a novel trial. Defendant appealed.CASE FACTS
Defendant possessed a vehicle nether a bailment lease. She was ii months behind inwards payments. The victim together with roughly other worker sought to repossess the vehicle inwards wide daylight, acre keeping the peace. Defendant shot together with seriously injured the victim equally he was assisting inwards the towing of the vehicle. Defendant contended that she was justified inwards shooting the victim because she idea he was committing a felony past times taking her vehicle.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, the courtroom held that accused was non justified inwards shooting the victim.
- The courtroom establish that that accused was non defending her person, or her abode or "castle."
- The courtroom held that that at that topographic point was no felony past times force, or whatsoever atrocious offense to locomote prevented.
- The courtroom establish that that at that topographic point was no danger to accused or her habitation.
- The courtroom held that that at that topographic point was no forcefulness past times an intruder for her to repel.
- In affirming, the courtroom held that at that topographic point was no justification inwards police pull for her infliction of grievous bodily price to the victim.
The courtroom affirmed the lawsuit court's judgment that convicted accused of aggravated assail together with battery.
Recommended Supplements for Criminal Law