For Your Data Freedman V. Maryland Illustration Brief

Freedman v. Maryland representative brief summary
380 U.S. 51 (1965)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Defendant appealed from a judgment of the Court of Appeals of Maryland, which affirmed his conviction for exhibiting a displace painting at his home without kickoff submitting the painting to the State Board of Censors (Board) equally required past times Md. Code Ann. art. 66A, § ii (1957).

CASE FACTS
Defendant wished to challenge the constitutionality of a reason censorship statute that required submission of all displace pictures to the Board prior to their exhibition. He exhibited a cinema without kickoff submitting it to the Board too was afterward convicted of violating the statute, Md. Code Ann. art. 66A, § ii (1957). The judgment of the case courtroom was affirmed, too on appeal of that determination the reviewing courtroom ruled inwards favor of defendant.

DISCUSSION

• The Court held that defendant's refusal to submit the cinema to the Board inwards violation but of § ii did non limit accused to an prepare on on that department alone. 
• The Court institute validity inwards defendant's disceptation that § ii effected an invalid prior restraint on the liberty of phonation communication because the construction of the other provisions of the statute contributed to the infirmity of § 2, too that he did non assert that the other provisions were independently invalid. 
• The Court institute that the statute lacked sufficient safeguards against undue inhibition of protected expression, too that rendered the § ii requirement of prior submission of films to the Board an invalid previous restraint inwards violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

CONCLUSION
Defendant's conviction for violation of a statute censorship statute was reversed.

Suggested constabulary schoolhouse course of education materials, hornbooks, too guides for Constitutional Law

Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.

Share this post