For Your Data Epperson V. Arkansas Representative Brief
December 10, 2019
Edit
Epperson v. Arkansas representative brief summary
393 U.S. 97 (1968)
CASE FACTS
The instructor had challenged the constitutionality of the Arkansas police describe that made it a misdemeanor to learn the development theory as well as subjected her to dismissal from her position.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The Court reversed the determination of the nation supreme court.
Suggested police describe schoolhouse course of teaching materials, hornbooks, as well as guides for Constitutional Law
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
393 U.S. 97 (1968)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff instructor brought an activeness that sought a proclamation that an Arkansas statute, Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 80-1627 as well as 1628, that made it unlawful for a instructor inwards a state-supported schoolhouse to learn evolution, was unconstitutional. The Arkansas Supreme Court reversed the chancery court's determination as well as held that the statute was a valid do of the state's ability to specify the curriculum inwards its world schools. The instructor appealed.CASE FACTS
The instructor had challenged the constitutionality of the Arkansas police describe that made it a misdemeanor to learn the development theory as well as subjected her to dismissal from her position.
DISCUSSION
- The Court did non residual its determination on the vagueness of the Arkansas statute, exactly held that the statute could non stand upwardly because the State of Arkansas' correct to prescribe the curriculum for its world schools did non bear amongst it the correct to prohibit, on hurting of criminal penalty, the teaching of a scientific theory or doctrine where the prohibition was based upon reasons that violated the First Amendment.
- There was no doubtfulness that Arkansas had sought to preclude its teachers from discussing the theory of evolution.
- Thus, the Arkansas police describe could non hold upwardly defended every mo an human activeness of religious neutrality because the State did non seek to excise degree the curricula of its schools as well as universities all give-and-take of the source of man.
- The police describe attempted to blot out a detail theory because of its supposed conflict amongst the Biblical account.
CONCLUSION
The Court reversed the determination of the nation supreme court.
Suggested police describe schoolhouse course of teaching materials, hornbooks, as well as guides for Constitutional Law
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.