For Your Data United States V. Scheffer Example Brief
November 22, 2019
Edit
United States v. Scheffer example brief summary
523 U.S. 303 (1998)
CASE FACTS
Airman tested positive for the role of drugs inward a urine bear witness administered past times Air Force Office of Special Investigations. He was after court-martialed for diverse offenses as well as sought to role results from a polygraph bear witness pertaining to those matters. The armed services gauge denied airman's motion to acknowledge polygraph, he was convicted, as well as Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces reversed. Government was granted certiorari.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The Court reversed.
Suggested police trace schoolhouse written report materials




Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
523 U.S. 303 (1998)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Petitioner Government challenged the determination of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, which reversed the lower court's judgment that a polygraph bear witness of respondent airman was inadmissible nether Mil. R. Evid. 707, Manual for Courts-Martial, during his court-martial proceeding.CASE FACTS
Airman tested positive for the role of drugs inward a urine bear witness administered past times Air Force Office of Special Investigations. He was after court-martialed for diverse offenses as well as sought to role results from a polygraph bear witness pertaining to those matters. The armed services gauge denied airman's motion to acknowledge polygraph, he was convicted, as well as Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces reversed. Government was granted certiorari.
DISCUSSION
- The Court establish the exclusion of evidence to hold upwards unconstitutionally arbitrary or disproportionate alone where it has infringed upon a weighty involvement of the defendant as well as that Rule 707 served several legitimate interests inward the criminal lawsuit process.
- The dominion was neither arbitrary nor disproportionate inward promoting these ends.
- Nor did it implicate a sufficiently weighty involvement of the airman to enhance a constitutional line of piece of job nether the Court's precedents, as well as at that spot was no consensus alongside jurisdictions that polygraph evidence was reliable.
- Further, the Court concluded that polygraph evidence could diminish the jury's component inward making credibility determinations.
CONCLUSION
The Court reversed.
Suggested police trace schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials