For Your Data United States V. Saada Representative Brief

United States v. Saada case brief summary
212 F.3d 210 (3d Cir. 2000)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Defendants appealed from an fellowship of the US District Court for the District of New Jersey, which convicted as well as sentenced defendants on insurance fraud related charges under 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 371, 1341, and 1343, as well as denied defendants' motion for a novel trial based on newly discovered evidence.

CASE FACTS
Defendants appealed from a district courtroom judgment which convicted as well as sentenced them under 18 U.S.C.S. §§ 371, 1341, and 1343. Defendants challenged the district court's denial of their motion for a novel trial made on the solid soil of newly discovered evidence that a authorities witness, subsequent to defendants' convictions, advised a 3rd political party to plough over simulated testimony inward a course case, inward provide for a reduced sentence.

DISCUSSION

The courtroom of appeals affirmed the district court's judgment final that the novel evidence was unlikely to arrive at an acquittal.
The courtroom noted the impeachment evidence presented at trial detailing the witness' propensity for deceitful acts as well as his incentive for testifying equally a authorities witness, as well as concluded that the district courtroom did non abuse its discretion inward ruling that the novel evidence was only cumulative.
Accordingly, defendants' convictions as well as sentences were affirmed.

CONCLUSION
Judgment affirmed. Denial of defendants' motion for a novel trial was proper because the novel trial was unlikely to arrive at an acquittal as well as the district courtroom did non abuse it's discretion inward ruling that the novel evidence was only cumulative.

Suggested constabulary schoolhouse written report materials