For Your Data Ehrlich V. Diggs Representative Brief

Ehrlich v. Diggs illustration brief summary
169 F.Supp.2d 124 (2001)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Plaintiff managing director of musical groups sought a component of accused artist's profits arising from his activities every bit a fellow member of a rap music grouping too every bit a solo artist. The creative individual moved to rank the sack and, inwards the alternative, for summary judgment.

CASE FACTS
The creative individual contended that New York constabulary applied too that New York's statute of frauds barred enforcement of the oral management agreement. The managing director countered that California constabulary applied too that nether the California statute of frauds, the management understanding was enforceable.

DISCUSSION

• The courtroom flora that California constabulary was applicable. 
• The managing director resided inwards California too negotiated too entered the terms of the oral management understanding inwards California. 
• Any actions taken past times the managing director inwards performing the understanding were inwards California. 
• Thus, the contract was non barred past times the statute of frauds. 
• The courtroom farther flora that the oral contract every bit alleged was sufficiently definite to locomote enforced because the terms personal representative too manager, standing alone, created enforceable rights too duties.

CONCLUSION
The artist's displace to rank the sack and, inwards alternative, for summary sentence was denied.


Suggested constabulary schoolhouse course of teaching materials, hornbooks, too guides for Contract Law

Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.

Share this post