For Your Data Drake V. Wickwire Illustration Brief
November 29, 2019
Edit
Drake v. Wickwire representative brief summary
795 P.2d 195 (1990)
CASE FACTS
A customer followed his attorney's advice to sell holding to buyers other than those amongst which the customer had entered into an earnest coin sales understanding later the attorney received data that the buyers amongst which in that place was the understanding mightiness non hold out able to perform on a detail date. After the sale, the agent for the buyers amongst whom the customer had the understanding sued the customer for his existent estate commission, together with summary judgment was granted to the agent because the customer had sold the holding earlier the fourth dimension inward the understanding had expired for the buyers amongst whom the customer had the understanding to tender payment, preventing surgical operation nether the agreement. The customer filed an activity against the attorney.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom reversed the grant of summary judgment for the attorney together with remanded for farther proceedings.
Suggested police pull schoolhouse course of written report materials, hornbooks, together with guides for Contract Law
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
795 P.2d 195 (1990)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant customer challenged a judgment of the Superior Court of the State of Alaska, Fourth Judicial District, which granted summary judgment to appellee attorney inward a malpractice activity arising out of the attorney's alleged inducement of the customer to intermission an earnest coin sales agreement.CASE FACTS
A customer followed his attorney's advice to sell holding to buyers other than those amongst which the customer had entered into an earnest coin sales understanding later the attorney received data that the buyers amongst which in that place was the understanding mightiness non hold out able to perform on a detail date. After the sale, the agent for the buyers amongst whom the customer had the understanding sued the customer for his existent estate commission, together with summary judgment was granted to the agent because the customer had sold the holding earlier the fourth dimension inward the understanding had expired for the buyers amongst whom the customer had the understanding to tender payment, preventing surgical operation nether the agreement. The customer filed an activity against the attorney.
DISCUSSION
- The courtroom reversed the lawsuit court's grant of summary judgment for the attorney, holding that although the customer failed to introduce skilful testimony regarding the attorney's breach of duty, the attorney was negligent every bit a affair of police pull because he did non human activity reasonably inward treating the agent's ambiguous comments regarding the buyer's potential lack of surgical operation on a detail appointment every bit a repudiation.
- The courtroom remanded the representative for farther proceedings.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom reversed the grant of summary judgment for the attorney together with remanded for farther proceedings.
Suggested police pull schoolhouse course of written report materials, hornbooks, together with guides for Contract Law
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.