For Your Data Whittaker V. Sandford Representative Brief

Whittaker v. Sandford illustration brief summary
85 A. 399 (1912)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Defendant leader appealed from the judgment of the lawsuit courtroom (Maine) that held inwards favor of plaintiff fellow member inwards the member's activity for faux imprisonment.

CASE FACTS
The fellow member was affiliated alongside a religious sect headed past times the leader. The sect owned 2 yachts that were used to carry members betwixt the U.S. in addition to Syria. The fellow member traveled to Syrian Arab Republic on 1 of the yachts only subsequently determined to operate out the sect in addition to supply to the United States. After a returning yacht reached the United States, the fellow member was refused role of the rowboats needed to accomplish shore despite numerous requests. She remained on the yacht for close a calendar month until she obtained her freedom through the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 jury concluded that the leader had falsely imprisoned the fellow member in addition to awarded her damages.

DISCUSSION

In affirming that judgment, the courtroom held that the lawsuit courtroom properly admitted show of the leader's influence over the other members every bit it was relevant to demo that, fifty-fifty though he was non aboard the yacht, he controlled the role of the rowboats in addition to used his influence to foreclose the fellow member from leaving.
The amount of the laurels was reduced past times the court, however, because the fellow member had been treated good during the ordeal.

CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the judgment inwards favor of the fellow member inwards her faux imprisonment activity against the leader; however, it ordered a reduction inwards the amount of the verdict awarded.

Suggested police trace schoolhouse report materials