For Your Data Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. V. Sturges Representative Brief

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Sturges illustration brief summary
52 S.W.3d 711 (2001)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Petitioner corporation filed a petition for review of the determination of the Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of Texas, affirming an honor of actual damages for respondent purchaser as well as remanding an honor of punitive damages for respondent, inward respondent's activeness alleging tortious interference amongst a prospective payoff as well as breach of contract.

CASE FACTS
Respondent purchaser brought an activeness against petitioner corporation, alleging tortious interference amongst a prospective payoff as well as breach of contract, next a dispute over respondent's buy of province that petitioner corporation had restriction rights over.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The case courtroom awarded respondent actual as well as punitive damages.

DISCUSSION

On appeal, the appellate courtroom affirmed the honor of actual damages merely remanded for a retrial of punitive damages, belongings that the case courtroom improperly excluded bear witness offered past times the plaintiffs during the punitive damages phase.
Petitioner filed a petition for review, claiming that in that place was no bear witness that it wrongfully interfered amongst respondent's prospective advantage, or that it breached its contract.
The courtroom granted the petition as well as reversed, rendering judgment for petitioner.
The courtroom held that in that place was no bear witness that petitioner's deport was independently tortious or unlawful, as well as that petitioner did non breach its contract every moment a affair of law.

CONCLUSION
Petition was granted as well as judgment was reversed because in that place was no bear witness that petitioner corporation's deport was independently tortious or unlawful, as well as petitioner did non breach its contract.

Suggested police pull schoolhouse written report materials