For Your Data Turner V. Big Lake Stone Oil Co. Example Brief
September 16, 2019
Edit
Turner v. Big Lake Oil Co. illustration brief summary
96 S.W.2d 221 (1936)
CASE FACTS
The petroleum society constructed large, artificial earthen ponds to shop polluted H2O that was generated past times its petroleum wells. On 1 occasion, H2O escaped from the ponds. It flowed onto the landowners' holding together with into the H2O sources the landowners used to H2O their livestock. The landowners filed adapt to recover damages for the harm caused to their property. The jury returned a verdict inwards favor of the petroleum company, terminal that the unloosen of the H2O was non the effect of negligence past times the petroleum company.
ARGUMENT
The landowners argued on appeal that the petroleum society was strictly liable for the release.
HOLDING
The courtroom disagreed, holding that the landowners were required to demonstrate negligence past times the petroleum society inwards club to recover damages for the harm caused to their property.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the conclusion of the appellate court.
Suggested police schoolhouse report materials




Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
96 S.W.2d 221 (1936)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff landowners filed adapt seeking to grip accused petroleum society liable for the harm caused past times the escape of H2O from its property. The thing was tried earlier a jury, which returned a verdict inwards favor of the petroleum company. The Court of Civil Appeals for the Eighth District (Texas) affirmed. The landowners appealed.CASE FACTS
The petroleum society constructed large, artificial earthen ponds to shop polluted H2O that was generated past times its petroleum wells. On 1 occasion, H2O escaped from the ponds. It flowed onto the landowners' holding together with into the H2O sources the landowners used to H2O their livestock. The landowners filed adapt to recover damages for the harm caused to their property. The jury returned a verdict inwards favor of the petroleum company, terminal that the unloosen of the H2O was non the effect of negligence past times the petroleum company.
ARGUMENT
The landowners argued on appeal that the petroleum society was strictly liable for the release.
HOLDING
The courtroom disagreed, holding that the landowners were required to demonstrate negligence past times the petroleum society inwards club to recover damages for the harm caused to their property.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the conclusion of the appellate court.
Suggested police schoolhouse report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials