For Your Data Tel-Oren V. Libyan Arab Commonwealth Illustration Brief
September 05, 2019
Edit
Tel-Oren v. Libyan Arab Republic instance brief summary
726 F.2d 774 (1984)
CASE FACTS
Plaintiffs, unusual citizens who were survivors in addition to representatives of persons murdered inwards a unusual country, filed conform against defendants seeking compensatory in addition to punitive damages. Plaintiffs alleged defendants were responsible for multiple tortious acts resulting from violations of the constabulary of nations, United States' treaties, United States' criminal constabulary in addition to the mutual law. The lawsuit courtroom dismissed plaintiffs' actions for lack of dependent area affair jurisdiction in addition to equally beingness fourth dimension barred nether the applicable statute of limitations.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the lawsuit court's dismissal of plaintiffs' action. The courtroom held that dependent area affair jurisdiction was lacking in addition to that the conform was fourth dimension barred nether the applicable statute of limitations.
***
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
726 F.2d 774 (1984)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiffs appealed from the U.S.A. District Court for the District of Columbia's dismissal of their activity alleging defendants committed multiple tortious acts inwards violation of the constabulary of nations, United States' treaties, United States' criminal law, in addition to mutual constabulary for lack of dependent area affair jurisdiction in addition to statute of limitations violations.CASE FACTS
Plaintiffs, unusual citizens who were survivors in addition to representatives of persons murdered inwards a unusual country, filed conform against defendants seeking compensatory in addition to punitive damages. Plaintiffs alleged defendants were responsible for multiple tortious acts resulting from violations of the constabulary of nations, United States' treaties, United States' criminal constabulary in addition to the mutual law. The lawsuit courtroom dismissed plaintiffs' actions for lack of dependent area affair jurisdiction in addition to equally beingness fourth dimension barred nether the applicable statute of limitations.
DISCUSSION
- The courtroom affirmed the determination of the lawsuit court.
- The courtroom held that dependent area affair jurisdiction was non proper nether either 28 U.S.C.S. § 1330 or 28 U.S.C.S. § 1602-1611 and that the activity was non filed inside the statute of limitations.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the lawsuit court's dismissal of plaintiffs' action. The courtroom held that dependent area affair jurisdiction was lacking in addition to that the conform was fourth dimension barred nether the applicable statute of limitations.
***
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.