For Your Data Only V. Marinette County Example Brief
September 01, 2019
Edit
Just v. Marinette County illustration brief summary
201 N.W.2d 761 (1972)
CASE FACTS
The landowners initiated a declaratory judgment activity inwards the lower courtroom seeking a determination that a shoreland zoning ordinance was unconstitutional. The lower courtroom dismissed the action.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the lower court's judgment, equally modified.
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
201 N.W.2d 761 (1972)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant landowners sought review of a determination yesteryear the Circuit Court for Marinette County (Wisconsin), which dismissed their activity for a declaratory judgment ruling equally to the constitutionality of a shoreland zoning ordinance.CASE FACTS
The landowners initiated a declaratory judgment activity inwards the lower courtroom seeking a determination that a shoreland zoning ordinance was unconstitutional. The lower courtroom dismissed the action.
DISCUSSION
- On review, the courtroom affirmed only modified the judgment of the lower court.
- The courtroom held that the landowners' belongings constituted wetlands in addition to that the provision of the ordinance that prohibited the filling of wetlands was constitutional.
- The courtroom farther held that the lower courtroom erred inwards dismissing the landowners' activity instead of issuing a declaratory judgment ruling.
- Thus, the courtroom modified the lower court's dismissal of the landowners' activity to educate forth a declaratory adjudication equally to the constitutionality of the ordinance.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the lower court's judgment, equally modified.
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.