For Your Data Mueller V. Hoblyn Instance Brief
September 01, 2019
Edit
Mueller v. Hoblyn illustration brief summary
887 P.2d 500 (1994)
CASE FACTS
The owners of the dominant estate to an ingress too egress easement filed an activity against the possessor of the servient estate to placidity championship to the easement. The possessor of the servient estate contended that the easement was abandoned through nonuse, too that his actions inwards drilling a good too growing crops on the easement had demonstrated his ownership of the easement through adverse possession.
DISCUSSION
The courtroom affirmed the judgment inwards role too reversed the judgment inwards part.
See also: Mueller v. Hoblyn illustration (full text) on Google Scholar.
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
887 P.2d 500 (1994)
CASE SYNOPSIS
The District Court of Laramie County (Wyoming) entered a judgment which declared that a share of an easement was terminated yesteryear the adverse possession of the accused servient estate owner, inwards an activity to placidity championship that was filed yesteryear the plaintiff owners of the dominant estate. The possessor of the servient estate too thence appealed.CASE FACTS
The owners of the dominant estate to an ingress too egress easement filed an activity against the possessor of the servient estate to placidity championship to the easement. The possessor of the servient estate contended that the easement was abandoned through nonuse, too that his actions inwards drilling a good too growing crops on the easement had demonstrated his ownership of the easement through adverse possession.
DISCUSSION
- The courtroom held:
- (1) the correct to usage the easement was non terminated yesteryear the performance of law;
- (2) the easement was too non terminated yesteryear estoppel;
- (3) the servient estate owner's actions inwards maintaining boundary fencing, growing diverse crops too drilling a H2O good did non strength out whatsoever share of the easement nether the dominion of adverse possession.
- The servient estate owner's usage of the easement was non adverse to the holders of the unused easement, too it was non inconsistent amongst the easement's live on to furnish ingress too egress.
The courtroom affirmed the judgment inwards role too reversed the judgment inwards part.
See also: Mueller v. Hoblyn illustration (full text) on Google Scholar.
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.