For Your Data Matrimony See Co. V. Allbritton Illustration Brief
September 16, 2019
Edit
Union Pump Co. v. Allbritton illustration brief summary
898 S.W.2d 773 (1995)
CASE FACTS
Respondent worker was injured when she slipped on a piping rack that was moisture because of efforts to extinguish burn downwardly inwards equipment made past times petitioner manufacturer. Respondent brought an activity against petitioner, alleging negligence, gross negligence, together with strict liability.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The lawsuit courtroom granted petitioner summary judgment because respondent failed to demonstrate that the burn downwardly inwards the equipment was the drive of the injury. The courtroom of appeals reversed together with remanded the illustration to the lawsuit court, belongings that at that topographic point were issues of fact concerning proximate cause together with producing cause. Petitioner sought a writ of fault challenging the judgment.
DISCUSSION
The courtroom reversed the conclusion of the courtroom of appeals together with rendered judgment that respondent worker guide maintain nix because that the burn downwardly created past times petitioner manufacturer's equipment was non the legal drive of the respondent's injuries.
Suggested police line schoolhouse report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
898 S.W.2d 773 (1995)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Petitioner manufacturer challenged a judgment from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth District of Texas, which reversed a lawsuit courtroom conclusion that had granted summary judgment to petitioner inwards respondent worker's activity for negligence, gross negligence, together with strict liability.CASE FACTS
Respondent worker was injured when she slipped on a piping rack that was moisture because of efforts to extinguish burn downwardly inwards equipment made past times petitioner manufacturer. Respondent brought an activity against petitioner, alleging negligence, gross negligence, together with strict liability.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The lawsuit courtroom granted petitioner summary judgment because respondent failed to demonstrate that the burn downwardly inwards the equipment was the drive of the injury. The courtroom of appeals reversed together with remanded the illustration to the lawsuit court, belongings that at that topographic point were issues of fact concerning proximate cause together with producing cause. Petitioner sought a writ of fault challenging the judgment.
DISCUSSION
- The courtroom held that inwards social club to hold upward a legal drive of another's harm, petitioner's negligence had to guide maintain been a "substantial" ingredient inwards bringing nearly respondent's injury.
- The courtroom held that legal cause was non established because petitioner's production did no to a greater extent than than practise the status that made respondent's injury possible.
- The courtroom reversed the courtroom of appeals' judgment, belongings that the circumstances surrounding respondent's injuries were likewise remotely connected amongst petitioner's deport or production to constitute a legal cause of her injuries.
The courtroom reversed the conclusion of the courtroom of appeals together with rendered judgment that respondent worker guide maintain nix because that the burn downwardly created past times petitioner manufacturer's equipment was non the legal drive of the respondent's injuries.
Suggested police line schoolhouse report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.