For Your Data Kramarsky V. Stahl Administration Illustration Brief
September 01, 2019
Edit
Kramarsky v. Stahl Management example brief summary
401 N.Y.S.2d 943 (1977)
CASE FACTS
Petitioner filed an application to demonstrate drive for an gild enjoining respondents from selling, renting, leasing, or otherwise disposing of an storey to anyone other than petitioner until in conclusion conclusion of a electrical load against respondent management straightaway pending earlier the State Division of Human Rights. The application was based upon a electrical load of discrimination past times applicant, a dark divorced woman, who contended that accused management unlawfully discriminated against her past times refusing to rent an storey because of her race, sex, in addition to marital status. Respondent management contended, however, that the application indicated that petitioner, an attorney, would live on an undesirable tenant.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom denied petitioner's application for an gild enjoining respondents from selling, renting, leasing, or otherwise disposing of an storey to anyone other than petitioner until in conclusion conclusion of a electrical load against respondent management. The courtroom was non persuaded that in that place was a reasonable likelihood that the accuse of discrimination against respondent management could live on sustained.
Suggested police pull schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
401 N.Y.S.2d 943 (1977)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Petitioner filed an application for an gild enjoining respondents from selling, renting, leasing, or otherwise disposing of an storey to anyone other than petitioner until in conclusion conclusion of a electrical load against respondent management straightaway pending earlier the State Division of Human Rights.CASE FACTS
Petitioner filed an application to demonstrate drive for an gild enjoining respondents from selling, renting, leasing, or otherwise disposing of an storey to anyone other than petitioner until in conclusion conclusion of a electrical load against respondent management straightaway pending earlier the State Division of Human Rights. The application was based upon a electrical load of discrimination past times applicant, a dark divorced woman, who contended that accused management unlawfully discriminated against her past times refusing to rent an storey because of her race, sex, in addition to marital status. Respondent management contended, however, that the application indicated that petitioner, an attorney, would live on an undesirable tenant.
DISCUSSION
- The courtroom held that in that place was cipher illegal inwards a landlord discriminating against lawyers every minute a group, or trying to boot the bucket along out of his edifice intelligent persons who were aware of their rights in addition to mightiness drive problem inwards the future.
- The courtroom was non persuaded that in that place was a reasonable likelihood that the accuse of discrimination could live on sustained.
- Accordingly, the courtroom denied the application in addition to vacated the temporary restraining order.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom denied petitioner's application for an gild enjoining respondents from selling, renting, leasing, or otherwise disposing of an storey to anyone other than petitioner until in conclusion conclusion of a electrical load against respondent management. The courtroom was non persuaded that in that place was a reasonable likelihood that the accuse of discrimination against respondent management could live on sustained.
Suggested police pull schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.