For Your Data Hayes V. Aquia Marina, Inc. Illustration Brief
September 01, 2019
Edit
Hayes v. Aquia Marina, Inc. case brief summary
414 S.E.2d 820 (1992)
CASE FACTS
Appellant servient estate possessor filed an activity to enjoin appellee dominant estate possessor from expanding its marina from 84 to 280 boat slips. Appellant alleged that the expansion would overburden the easement in addition to that proposed paving of the easement was allowed.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The trial courtroom affirmed the findings of the chancery that the expansion would non overburden the easement.
HOLDING
On appeal, the courtroom affirmed the trial court's decision, belongings that it was supported yesteryear show in addition to was non evidently wrong.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the trial court's determination which affirmed chancery commissioner's finding that appellee dominant estate owner's expansion of a marina would non overburden an easement inwards appellant servient estate owner's conform to enjoin the expansion.
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
414 S.E.2d 820 (1992)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Appellant servient estate possessor sought review of the determination of the Circuit Court of Stafford County (Virginia), which affirmed chancery commissioner's finding that appellee dominant estate owner's expansion of a marina would non overburden an easement inwards appellant's conform to enjoin the expansion.CASE FACTS
Appellant servient estate possessor filed an activity to enjoin appellee dominant estate possessor from expanding its marina from 84 to 280 boat slips. Appellant alleged that the expansion would overburden the easement in addition to that proposed paving of the easement was allowed.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The trial courtroom affirmed the findings of the chancery that the expansion would non overburden the easement.
HOLDING
On appeal, the courtroom affirmed the trial court's decision, belongings that it was supported yesteryear show in addition to was non evidently wrong.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the trial court's determination which affirmed chancery commissioner's finding that appellee dominant estate owner's expansion of a marina would non overburden an easement inwards appellant servient estate owner's conform to enjoin the expansion.
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.