For Your Data Ward V. Slavecek Example Brief
August 31, 2019
Edit
Ward v. Slavecek example brief summary
466 S.W.2d 91 (1971)
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The lower courtroom rendered a take-nothing judgment inward favor of accused following landowners in addition to concluded that plaintiff landowner did non constitute a correct to an implied easement over a driveway on defendants' property.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the take-nothing sentence inward favor of accused following landowners in addition to held that plaintiff landowner did non constitute an implied easement every minute a thing of constabulary because the easement was non strictly necessary to the purpose of the dominant estate where in that place was bear witness that plaintiff could access her garage without using defendants' driveway.
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
466 S.W.2d 91 (1971)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Plaintiff landowner sought review of a judgment of the 18th District Court, Johnson County, Texas, which rendered a take-nothing judgment inward favor of accused following landowners in addition to concluded that plaintiff did non constitute a correct to an implied easement over defendants' property.PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The lower courtroom rendered a take-nothing judgment inward favor of accused following landowners in addition to concluded that plaintiff landowner did non constitute a correct to an implied easement over a driveway on defendants' property.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, the courtroom affirmed in addition to held that plaintiff did non constitute an implied easement every minute a thing of constabulary because the easement was non strictly necessary to the purpose of the dominant estate.
- The courtroom noted that in that place was bear witness that plaintiff could access her garage without using defendants' driveway.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the take-nothing sentence inward favor of accused following landowners in addition to held that plaintiff landowner did non constitute an implied easement every minute a thing of constabulary because the easement was non strictly necessary to the purpose of the dominant estate where in that place was bear witness that plaintiff could access her garage without using defendants' driveway.
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.