For Your Data Van Sicklen V. Browne Illustration Brief
August 31, 2019
Edit
Van Sicklen v. Browne instance brief summary
92 Cal. Rptr. 786 (1971)
CASE FACTS
A metropolis planning committee denied the application of petitioners, landowners, for a allow to construct a service station on their lot, which met the zoning requirements of Militas, Cal., Zoning Ordinance § 8.90, because it did non adapt to the city's principal plan, which was adopted under Cal. Gov't. Code § 65300. Respondents, the metropolis council, affirmed the denial, too the lawsuit courtroom denied petitioner's petition for a writ of mandate.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the judgment denying petitioner landowners a writ of mandate to review the social club of respondent metropolis council affirming the denial of their application to construct a service station on their lot that met the zoning requirements. The courtroom held that the zoning ordinance expressly gave the planning committee permission to deny the allow because the place of petitioner's lot did non adapt to the principal innovation for service stations.
Suggested police describe schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
92 Cal. Rptr. 786 (1971)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Petitioner landowners appealed a judgment from the Superior Court, Santa Clara County (California) that denied their petition for a writ of mandate to review an social club from respondent metropolis council members affirming denial of their application for a allow to construct a service station on their lot because the service station did non adapt to the city's principal plan, although the lot met the requirements of a local zoning ordinance.CASE FACTS
A metropolis planning committee denied the application of petitioners, landowners, for a allow to construct a service station on their lot, which met the zoning requirements of Militas, Cal., Zoning Ordinance § 8.90, because it did non adapt to the city's principal plan, which was adopted under Cal. Gov't. Code § 65300. Respondents, the metropolis council, affirmed the denial, too the lawsuit courtroom denied petitioner's petition for a writ of mandate.
DISCUSSION
- On appeal, the courtroom held that because Militas, Cal. Zoning Ordinance §§ 1.02 too 17.01 permitted service stations if their place conformed to the objectives of the principal plan, the planning committee had discretion to deny the application.
- Because intensity of nation purpose was a valid municipal line concern related to a city's wellness too security factors too was a permissible champaign of written report for zoning under Cal. Gov't. Code § 65850(c), the planning committee properly denied petitioner's application where 4 other service stations were located inside a brusk distance of petitioner's lot.
- The courtroom held that the indirect touching of the ordinance on contest did non invalidate it.
- Therefore, the courtroom affirmed the judgment.
CONCLUSION
The courtroom affirmed the judgment denying petitioner landowners a writ of mandate to review the social club of respondent metropolis council affirming the denial of their application to construct a service station on their lot that met the zoning requirements. The courtroom held that the zoning ordinance expressly gave the planning committee permission to deny the allow because the place of petitioner's lot did non adapt to the principal innovation for service stations.
Suggested police describe schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.