For Your Data Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. V. Postash Corp. Of Saskatchewan, Inc. Instance Brief Notes
August 31, 2019
Edit
Blomkest Fertilizer, Inc. v. Postash Corp. of Saskatchewan, Inc. case brief notes
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse written report materials




Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
-
Plus Factor:
Evidence For
Evidence Against
Communication:
- Periodic toll verification calls - (high grade executive calls kickoff 1987)
- Solicitations
- Calls were subsequent to the toll increase
- Calls infrequent, sporadic
No legit justification:
- Price was non the projected toll expected based upon the Suspension Agreement
- No justification for the toll verification calls
- Alternative explanation based upon the Suspension Agreement
- Privatization of PCS explains alter inwards behavior
Irrational w/o Agreement:
- "market correction" computer program that lowers prices to deter "cheating"
Market Structure:
- Oligopoly
- Fungible production (potash)
- Inelastic demand? Was at that spot testify of this?
- Barriers to entry (again, was at that spot evidence?)
- Industry excess capacity
- Cartel is non inevitable inwards oligopoly
- Industry excess capacity
Suggested constabulary schoolhouse written report materials
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials