For Your Data Anderson V. Bessemer Metropolis Illustration Brief

Anderson v. Bessemer City representative brief summary
470 U.S. 564 (1985)

CASE SYNOPSIS

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari from a determination of the the States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which reversed a district court's finding of gender-based occupation discrimination past times respondent metropolis against petitioner inwards an activity filed past times petitioner nether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e et seq.

CASE FACTS
Petitioner filed an activity nether Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e et seq., alleging that respondent had discriminated against her on the footing of gender. The lower appellate courtroom reversed the district court's finding of discrimination on the solid pose down that it works life 3 of the district court's findings were clearly erroneous.

DISCUSSION

• On certiorari, the courtroom stated that the "clearly erroneous" criterion did non title a reviewing courtroom to opposite a finding of trier of fact precisely because it was convinced that it would convey decided representative differently. 
• The lower appellate courtroom overstepped the bounds of its duty under Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a) if it undertook to duplicate the component of a lawsuit court. 
• The courtroom held that the lower appellate courtroom improperly conducted what amounted to de novo weighing of show inwards the record. 
• The courtroom held that when the tape was examined inwards low-cal of the appropriate standard, it contained aught that mandated the finding that the district court's conclusion was clearly erroneous.

CONCLUSION
The courtroom reversed the judgment.

Suggested constabulary schoolhouse course of report materials, hornbooks, too guides for Civil Procedure

Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials.

Share this post