For Your Data American Life Insurance Co. V. Stewart Illustration Brief
August 30, 2019
Edit
American Life Insurance Co. v. Stewart representative brief summary
300 U.S. 203 (1937)
CASE FACTS
After decedent insured's death, petitioner insurer brought an activity for cancellation of life insurance policies on the terra firma of fraud inwards their procurement. Respondent beneficiaries moved to dismiss the neb for desire of equity in addition to brought an activity at police pull to recover the insurance proceeds. Upon the lawsuit of the adjust inwards equity, the district courtroom flora at that topographic point were fraudulent representations in addition to decreed cancellation in addition to give upward of the policies, the judgment of which the appellate courtroom reversed subsequently finally that petitioner's neb inwards equity should convey been dismissed because it had an adequate remedy at law.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
The Supreme Court reversed the judgment that dismissed petitioner insurer's neb inwards equity where the neb inwards equity did non convey to last dismissed when respondent beneficiaries brought an activity at police pull to recover insurance proceeds, because petitioner had no remedy at police pull except upon the volition of respondents. The Court remanded the activity for a consideration of the merits.
Suggested police pull schoolhouse course of report materials, hornbooks, in addition to guides for Civil Procedure
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.
300 U.S. 203 (1937)
CASE SYNOPSIS
Petitioner sought certiorari review of a judgment from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which reversed a decree for the cancellation in addition to give upward of life insurance policies issued yesteryear petitioner insurer on the terra firma that petitioner had an adequate remedy at police pull against respondent beneficiaries.CASE FACTS
After decedent insured's death, petitioner insurer brought an activity for cancellation of life insurance policies on the terra firma of fraud inwards their procurement. Respondent beneficiaries moved to dismiss the neb for desire of equity in addition to brought an activity at police pull to recover the insurance proceeds. Upon the lawsuit of the adjust inwards equity, the district courtroom flora at that topographic point were fraudulent representations in addition to decreed cancellation in addition to give upward of the policies, the judgment of which the appellate courtroom reversed subsequently finally that petitioner's neb inwards equity should convey been dismissed because it had an adequate remedy at law.
DISCUSSION
- On certiorari review, the U.S.A. Supreme Court held that the adjust inwards equity did non convey to last dismissed when respondents sued to recover on the policies at law.
- Although petitioner could convey contested the policy every bit a defence to the activity at law, petitioner had no remedy at police pull except at the pleasance of respondents.
CONCLUSION
The Supreme Court reversed the judgment that dismissed petitioner insurer's neb inwards equity where the neb inwards equity did non convey to last dismissed when respondent beneficiaries brought an activity at police pull to recover insurance proceeds, because petitioner had no remedy at police pull except upon the volition of respondents. The Court remanded the activity for a consideration of the merits.
Suggested police pull schoolhouse course of report materials, hornbooks, in addition to guides for Civil Procedure
Shop Amazon for the best prices on Law School Course Materials
.