For Your Data Washington V. Davis Illustration Brief Summary
March 03, 2019
Edit
Washington v. Davis (1976)
Facts: Unsuccessful African-American applicants to D.C. constabulary forcefulness claimed that verbal skills exam unconstitutionally discriminated against them because a higher pct of African-Americans than of white Americans failed the test. They claimed that at that spot was no prove establishing the test's accuracy inwards standard subsequent project performance, but NOT that the exam constituted "intentional" or "purposeful" discrimination against them.
Issue/Holding: Is a law or other official deed is unconstitutional only because it has a racially disproportionate impact? No.
Reasoning/Major Points:
· Court holds that 1) at that spot is a rational footing for test; together with 2) at that spot was no invidious role inwards administration
· The invidious lineament of a law claimed to live on racially discriminatory must live on traced to a racially discriminatory purpose.
· This is non to enjoin that the necessary discriminatory racial role must live on limited or seem on the confront of the statute (J. Stevens's concurring thought elaborates on this). An invidious discriminatory role may oft live on inferred from the totality of the relevant facts.
o Nevertheless, the Court has non held that a law, neutral on its confront together with serving ends otherwise inside the ability of authorities to pursue, is invalid nether the EP clause only because it may deport upon a greater proportion of 1 race than of another.
o Disproportionate impact is non irrelevant, but it is non the sole touchstone of an invidious racial discrimination forbidden past times the Con.