For Your Data Xanthous Cab V. Dreslin Example Brief Summary
February 24, 2019
Edit
Yellow Cab v. Dreslin example brief summary
F: Jury established collision to convey been caused past times concurrent negligent of ii cars. TC held that equally Dreslin was non liable inwards tort to his wife, at that spot was no articulation liability btw Dreslin too Cab co equally to Dreslin’s wife.
Taxi cab driven past times its agent too vehicle driven past times Dreslin collided. Dreslin’s married adult woman too others inwards Dreslin’s motorcar were injured. They sued the Taxi cab for damages.
R: In example of contribution betwixt tortfeasors, when the married adult woman of the tortfeasor is the i against whom contribution is sought, neither hubby nor married adult woman is liable for tortuous human activity past times i against the other.
C: affirmed
Co: if D is immuned from P, his co-D cannot sue D for contribution.
F: Jury established collision to convey been caused past times concurrent negligent of ii cars. TC held that equally Dreslin was non liable inwards tort to his wife, at that spot was no articulation liability btw Dreslin too Cab co equally to Dreslin’s wife.
Taxi cab driven past times its agent too vehicle driven past times Dreslin collided. Dreslin’s married adult woman too others inwards Dreslin’s motorcar were injured. They sued the Taxi cab for damages.
R: In example of contribution betwixt tortfeasors, when the married adult woman of the tortfeasor is the i against whom contribution is sought, neither hubby nor married adult woman is liable for tortuous human activity past times i against the other.
C: affirmed
Co: if D is immuned from P, his co-D cannot sue D for contribution.