For Your Data Strauder V. Due West Virginia Illustration Brief Summary
February 25, 2019
Edit
Strauder v. West Virginia case brief summary
100 States 303 (1880)
Synopsis
A dispute arose as to whether a nation could discriminate on the dry reason of race inwards selecting jurors.
Synopsis
A dispute arose as to whether a nation could discriminate on the dry reason of race inwards selecting jurors.
Case Facts
Strauder had been convicted of murder past times a West Virginia court. At the time, a West Virginia statute prohibited blacks from serving on juries. Strauder sought to take the example to federal courtroom too to challenge the composition of the jury, but his efforts were unsuccessful.
Strauder had been convicted of murder past times a West Virginia court. At the time, a West Virginia statute prohibited blacks from serving on juries. Strauder sought to take the example to federal courtroom too to challenge the composition of the jury, but his efforts were unsuccessful.
Issue
Does a police pull prohibiting blacks from serving on juries violate the Fourteenth Amendment?
Legal Holding
Such a police pull violates Fourteenth Amendment.
Does a police pull prohibiting blacks from serving on juries violate the Fourteenth Amendment?
Legal Holding
Such a police pull violates Fourteenth Amendment.
Legal Analysis
Strong, J.
The Fourteenth Amendment was ratified specifically for the role of protecting the latterly emancipated slaves against discrimination past times the states. The West Virginia statute infringes upon Strauder’s correct to a fair trial, as a jury consisting solely of whites could non perchance hold upward a jury of his peers. The prejudices of sure as shooting classes inwards gild against others are good known. It could hardly hold upward doubted that a dominion prohibiting whites from serving on juries would hold upward regarded as unfair.
Justice Field, joined past times Justice Clifford, dissenting.
Equal protection nether the Fourteenth Amendment does non involve a dark individual to hold upward entitled to a mixed jury. No ane contends that women or other groups should hold upward entitled to jurors from their respective groups. There is no argue to intend that white jurors would non hold upward every bit fair to all defendants. Furthermore, the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees but civil rights as opposed to political rights. Jury duty is a political correct too ought to hold upward regulated as the states encounter fit.
Strong, J.
The Fourteenth Amendment was ratified specifically for the role of protecting the latterly emancipated slaves against discrimination past times the states. The West Virginia statute infringes upon Strauder’s correct to a fair trial, as a jury consisting solely of whites could non perchance hold upward a jury of his peers. The prejudices of sure as shooting classes inwards gild against others are good known. It could hardly hold upward doubted that a dominion prohibiting whites from serving on juries would hold upward regarded as unfair.
Justice Field, joined past times Justice Clifford, dissenting.
Equal protection nether the Fourteenth Amendment does non involve a dark individual to hold upward entitled to a mixed jury. No ane contends that women or other groups should hold upward entitled to jurors from their respective groups. There is no argue to intend that white jurors would non hold upward every bit fair to all defendants. Furthermore, the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees but civil rights as opposed to political rights. Jury duty is a political correct too ought to hold upward regulated as the states encounter fit.