For Your Data Riss V. Ny Illustration Brief Summary
February 23, 2019
Edit
Riss v. NY representative brief summary
F: P was terrorized for morethan half-dozen mth yesteryear Burton, whom she rejected. Burton threatened to convey P killed if hse did non yield to him. P went to police, only ignored. P became engaged to or in addition to thence other man, in addition to during her twenty-four hr menstruum of the month political party Burton wanred P that it was final chance. P i time again begged the constabulary for help, only she was refused. Man hired yesteryear Burton attacked P, in addition to P was injured. P sued D, NY city, for negligent failure to render constabulary protection. TC ruled inwards favor D. air-conditioning affirmed
R: Cities are immune from liability for the negligent failure to render adequate constabulary protection.
A: the amount of constabulary protection available to individuals is express yesteryear community resources in addition to is a legislative executive decision.
C: affirmed
F: P was terrorized for morethan half-dozen mth yesteryear Burton, whom she rejected. Burton threatened to convey P killed if hse did non yield to him. P went to police, only ignored. P became engaged to or in addition to thence other man, in addition to during her twenty-four hr menstruum of the month political party Burton wanred P that it was final chance. P i time again begged the constabulary for help, only she was refused. Man hired yesteryear Burton attacked P, in addition to P was injured. P sued D, NY city, for negligent failure to render constabulary protection. TC ruled inwards favor D. air-conditioning affirmed
R: Cities are immune from liability for the negligent failure to render adequate constabulary protection.
A: the amount of constabulary protection available to individuals is express yesteryear community resources in addition to is a legislative executive decision.
C: affirmed