For Your Data Pe Vs. Pe Instance Brief Summary
February 01, 2019
Edit
PE vs. PE
Facts:
Facts:
Plaintiffs are the parents, brothers together with sisters of 1 Lolita Pe. At the fourth dimension of her disappearance on Apr 14, 1957, Lolita was 24 years former together with unmarried. Defendant is a married human being together with industrial plant equally agent of the La Perla Cigar together with Cigarette Factory. Defendant was an adopted boy of a Chinaman named Pe Beco, a collateral relative of Lolita's father. Because of such fact together with the similarity inward their identify unit of measurement name, accused became around the plaintiffs who regarded him equally a fellow member of their family. Sometime inward 1952, accused frequented the trouble solid of Lolita on the pretext that he wanted her to learn him how to pray the rosary. The ii eventually cruel inward dearest alongside each other together with conducted surreptitious trysts together with exchanged dearest notes The rumors nearly their dearest affairs reached Lolita's parents sometime, inward 1955, together with since together with therefore accused was forbidden from going to their trouble solid together with from farther seeing Lolita. The plaintiffs fifty-fifty filed deportation proceedings against defendant. The matter betwixt accused together with Lolita continued nonetheless. On Apr 14, 1957, Lolita disappeared from their trouble solid only her brothers together with sisters constitute a regime notation written yesteryear the defendant.
Issue:
Issue:
Whether the accused is liable according to Article 21 of the Civil Code
Ruling:
Ruling:
Because of the frequency of his visits to the Lolita’s identify unit of measurement who was allowed gratis access because he was a collateral relative together with was considered equally a fellow member of her family, the ii eventually cruel inward dearest alongside each other together with conducted surreptitious dearest affairs. Even when the accused is prohibited to run into Lolita, the accused continued his dearest affairs alongside her until she disappeared from the parental home. The incorrect he has caused her together with her identify unit of measurement is indeed immeasurable considering the fact that he is a married man. Verily, he has committed an injury equally contemplated inward Article 21 of the New Civil Code. Defendant is sentenced to pay the plaintiffs the substance of P5,000.00 equally damages together with P2,000.00 equally attorney's fees together with expenses of litigations