For Your Data Lock V. Falkenstine Illustration Brief Summary
February 03, 2019
Edit
Lock v. Falkenstine – Cockfighting
1. FACTS: Ct was unsure whether cockfighting should hold upwardly protected past times the creature cruelty statute.
2. ISSUE: Is a gamecock considered an creature statutorily?
a. In past times had been distinction betwixt domestic animals in addition to domestic fowl
b. Here linguistic communication is non certain
3. HOLDING: Roosters are non animals every bit defined past times the statute, in addition to cockfighting is non deemed illegal
a. Men of ordinary tidings can’t hold upwardly expected to presume cocks = animals for purposes of fighting prohibition
b. Legislature tin enact specific legislation inward gild to take all doubt
4. RULE: If nosotros CAN define an creature in addition to convey non done so, in addition to hence that is past times choice, at that spot is a argue behind it.