For Your Data Konic International Venture V. Spokane Figurer Services, Inc. Example Brief Summary

Konic International Corporation v. Spokane Computer Services, Inc. illustration brief summary

(Court of Appeals of Idaho, 1985)

Procedural History: Magistrate without jury ruled that in that place was no contract betwixt parties because of lack of authorisation of an employee of the defendant. Plaintiff appealed to the District Court. the District Court upheld the magistrate’s judgment. Plaintiff as well as hence appealed to Appellate Court. Appellate Court affirmed the magistrate’s judgment, soundless for dissimilar reasons.

Case Facts: A immature employee of the accused agreed to buy a surge protector for “fifty-six twenty” thinking it toll $56.20 simply inwards reality it toll $5,620. Once the accused realized the mistake, they tried to furnish it. The plaintiff, however, refused. They went to court. 

 

Issue: Whether a contract (K) is valid when in that place is a misunderstanding most the damage betwixt parties.

Holding: Both parties attributed dissimilar meanings to the same term, “fifty-six twenty.” Thus, in that place was no coming together of the minds of the parties since in that place were 2 meanings to a cloth term. We create non accomplish the consequence of whether Young had authorisation to fellowship the equipment. (attorney’s fees) Because this was a arrange on a contract for the alleged sale of goods, the accused is entitled to an accolade of attorney fees on appeal every bit the prevailing party, fifty-fifty though no liability nether a contract was established.

Share this post