For Your Data Davison V. Snohomish County Illustration Brief Summary
February 24, 2019
Edit
Davison v. Snohomish County example brief summary
F: The Ps were driving across a couple as well as lost control. Their auto skidded, broke through a railing, as well as barbarous to the ground. The Ps sued for their injuries, alleging that the county was negligent inwards non installing railings rigid plenty to proceed a auto from breaking through. The Ds alleged contributory negligence as well as denied its ain negligence. TC ruled inwards favor of the Ps. The D outset moved for judgment nevertheless the verdict as well as was denied. Then the D appealed.
R: county is non neg. for failing to build security railing where the structure of such railing would exercise an undue burden on the county as well as foreclose structure of other roads.
A: it’s extra difficult to brand sturdy railings on elevated causeways or viaducts. It is non reasonable to bailiwick communities to liability for non-ideal security precautions.
C:reversed
A: it’s extra difficult to brand sturdy railings on elevated causeways or viaducts. It is non reasonable to bailiwick communities to liability for non-ideal security precautions.
C:reversed