What Side Past Times Side Afterward The Uk Vote To Function Out The Eu?

Professor Steve Peers

Many of the consequences of the UK’s vote to leave of absence the European Union volition non endure clear for around time. However, here’s my initial bring on around of the fundamental issues, inwards their broader political context.

1 Is the plebiscite vote binding?

Legally, no. But it is politically unthinkable that it volition endure ignored, inwards especial yesteryear MPs whose constituency voted to leave.

2 Could the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland merely renegotiate its European Union membership again, as well as so handgrip a plebiscite on those results, rather than genuinely Leave the EU?

This is technically possible, as well as around on the Leave side hinted at this equally a possibility. However, a lot of Leave voters mightiness resent this idea, equally they likely thought that they were genuinely voting to leave of absence the European Union – although they would of course of report get got the run a hazard to confirm that seat inwards the minute referendum.

This selection would also require the remaining European Union to endure willing to offering such a re-renegotiation, as well as it mightiness also endure hard to seat into effect, since it would likely involve a Treaty amendment (limiting the costless motility of people, for instance) ratified yesteryear all Member States.

3 What is the procedure to leave of absence the EU?

The official procedure is get down inwards Article l of the Treaty of European Union. I’ve blogged nearly that inwards item here, as well as there’s a shorter version of my analysis here.

It would also endure possible to leave of absence the European Union yesteryear amending the Treaties, although it is hard to run across why that would endure an attractive selection to the UK, since it would require long ratification periods as well as unanimous voting on the European Union side.

Some on the Leave side get got hinted that they recall at that topographic point is around alternative mystery procedure to leave, although they get got non defined why they recall this or what that would entail. The likelihood is so that Article l volition endure used. Any alternative approach would probable human face upwards a successful legal challenge.

4 What does Article l say?

The United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland notifies a withdrawal determination to the EU. That triggers a two-year catamenia at the goal of which the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland is no longer an European Union member. That fourth dimension tin endure shorter (if an EU/UK withdrawal treaty provides for this). It could also endure longer if all Member U.S. as well as the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland agree.

It is upwards to the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland when just to notify the withdrawal decision. It could delay making the notification, although a really long delay could perhaps growth economical dubiousness as well as fuel distrust yesteryear Leave voters.

The negotiation concerns a withdrawal agreement. It is non clear if this is a technical understanding limited to the fiddly details of the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland leaving, or whether it would also regulation the EU-UK time to come relationship. The signal is relevant since otherwise the EU-UK human relationship would get got to endure negotiated separately, as well as different rules would apply. While the withdrawal understanding is dependent area to bulk voting amid the remaining European Union Member States, it is to a greater extent than probable that a separate bargain would endure dependent area to unanimous voting as well as national ratification.

It is also non clear if a notification to leave of absence the European Union tin endure withdrawn after it is made. That would endure relevant if the innovation were to negotiate the time to come UK/EU relationship, so inquire the populace inwards around other plebiscite whether they wanted to leave of absence on those price or not.

5 Can the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland amend laws relating to European Union membership already?

Can the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland modify its police to contradict European Union police – repealing the European Communities Act, restricting the entry of European Union citizens – spell all the same an European Union member? As a affair of domestic law, the answer is yes: the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland courts volition bring as well as apply whatever Act of Parliament equally the police of the land, regardless of whether it contradicts European Union or other international law.

However, this approach would indeed contradict European Union as well as international law, equally Professor Kenneth Armstrong has pointed out here. The enquiry is whether that mightiness prompt a retaliatory response from the residual of the European Union equally regards European Union business, or complicate the withdrawal negotiations.

6 What volition endure the time to come human relationship betwixt the European Union as well as the UK?

What is the best model for a time to come UK/EU relationship? The Vote Leave side seemed to prefer a novel treaty non based on the model of previous treaties alongside non-EU countries. This would of course of report require the consent of the EU, as well as would probable bring longer to negotiate than using an existing model.

Looking at existing models, the EU/Turkey organization is unsuitable since it is a customs union, pregnant that the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland cannot negotiate its ain merchandise deals alongside 3rd countries. The EU/Swiss bargain does non give total access to European Union services, including fiscal markets, although this is a fundamental United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland export. Equally the EU’s diverse costless merchandise agreements create non give such access either.

The most attractive selection is, for at to the lowest degree a temporary period, for the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland to hold alongside the ‘Norway option’, which way continuing to remain component of the European Economic Area (EEA), the association understanding betwixt the EU, Norway, Republic of Iceland as well as Liechtenstein.

There are a number of reasons to prefer this approach. It would render legal safety for exports of most goods as well as all services exports from the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland to the European Union (and vice versa). Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 bargain on this could endure done quickly, thus reducing the damaging effects of dubiousness nearly the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland as well as European Union economies, since the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland is already a component of the EEA, as well as so arguably does non involve to instruct through whatever procedure to bring together it. (There could endure a legal dispute on this point, though, since at that topographic point is no limited dominion inwards the EEA treaty on what happens if the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland leaves the EEA: run across the comments on this blog post). The EEA selection is clearly the simplest way to leave of absence the European Union sooner, rather than subsequently – which should appeal to opponents of the EU.

EEA membership would leave of absence the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland costless to sign its ain merchandise deals alongside other countries. The United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland would non endure jump yesteryear the EU’s fisheries or agriculture or VAT policy, so could modify its police inwards those areas too. The EEA doesn’t encompass unusual policy or criminal police or policing issues, although the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland could seek to negotiate a separate bargain alongside the European Union on those issues (on this facial expression of Brexit, run across my word here).

The EEA does encompass most European Union laws on workers’ rights as well as the surroundings – so signing upwards to the EEA would guarantee the continued application of those laws inwards the UK. That's a large wages for those who back upwards such laws.

There are limitations to the EEA option, although they could endure addressed. First of all, staying inwards the EEA does entail continued costless motility of people, as well as that is 1 of the fundamental reasons for the Leave vote. However, different betwixt European Union members at that topographic point is a special safeguard. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Member State tin disapply component of the EEA ‘If serious economic, societal or environmental difficulties of a sectorial or regional nature liable to persist are arising.’

This determination is unilateral, although an arbitrator tin dominion on the ‘scope as well as duration’ of the safeguard. Also, the EEA specifies remaining European Union could retaliate against whatever such United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland determination (limiting United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland machine exports or fiscal services exports), although 1 time again an arbitrator tin dominion on the ambit of this retaliation.

In short, the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland could invoke a safeguard clause to boundary the costless motility of persons nether the EEA – but it would non endure cost-free. Having said that the EEA selection would likely exclusively endure politically feasible inwards the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland if the authorities announced its immediate intention to trigger at nowadays the safeguard clause equally regards costless motility of people. 

Another limitation of the EEA is that the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland would no longer get got a vote on European Union laws equally the European Union adopted them. Those laws would inwards regulation all the same get got to endure applied inwards the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland despite the absence of a vote. Two points on this though. First of all, the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland would non endure dependent area to equally many European Union laws equally is at nowadays – since agriculture, fisheries, taxation as well as non-EU merchandise are non inside the ambit of the EEA. Secondly, for whatever European Union police to apply to the non-EU members of the EEA it must endure approved yesteryear those non-EU members. So the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland could veto the application of that novel European Union police to the UK at this phase – although again, the EEA provides for possible retaliation yesteryear the European Union if it does so.

Finally, the EEA provides expressly for the non-EU members to pay towards poorer European Union Member States. Some claimed during the motility that Kingdom of Norway provides this coin wholly voluntarily, but that’s false. Article 116 of the EEA Treaty says equally follows:

Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 Financial Mechanism shall endure established yesteryear the EFTA U.S. to contribute, inwards the context of the EEA as well as inwards improver to the efforts already deployed yesteryear the Community inwards this regard, to the objectives set downwards inwards Article 115.

The details of the sums involved are get down inwards separate Protocols. The United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland would get got to negotiate 1 of these alongside the EU.

Overall, then, at that topographic point are pros as well as cons to the Kingdom of Norway option. In my view, the pros hugely outweigh the cons – considering that the EEA could endure used equally a purely interim stair out spell negotiating a longer-term arrangement, which could bring the shape of amendments to the EEA itself.

7 Do European Union as well as United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland migrants get got 'acquired rights'?  

In human terms, the biggest number for Brexit is what happens to EU citizens inwards the UK, as well as to UK citizens inwards the EU. That number is discussed inwards the linked spider web log posts, but there’s also the enquiry of whether the legal seat of all such persons is protected yesteryear the regulation of ‘acquired rights’, equally referred to inwards the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. The Leave side argued that it was, but others (for instance, Professor earlier analysis of the possible legal complications for an independent Scotland seeking to bring together the European Union – although around of this analysis is specifically based on the supposition that the UK, along alongside Scotland, would endure an European Union Member State.

Furthermore, the political context is perhaps at nowadays different than it was inwards 2014, at the fourth dimension of the Scottish independence referendum. It may endure that the remaining European Union could get got to a greater extent than political volition to welcome Scotland equally an European Union fellow member than it mightiness get got had inwards 2014, inwards the interests of stemming whatever perception that the European Union is falling apart. Indeed, it mightiness endure to a greater extent than willing to waive the commons criteria of unmarried currency membership as well as Schengen participation. The Castilian authorities inwards component inwards 2014, which was a principal obstruction to Scottish European Union membership, mightiness non endure inwards component whatever more: nosotros should know after this weekend. Possibly around Member U.S. poured mutual frigidness H2O on Scottish European Union membership inwards 2014 out of loyalty to the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland – but at nowadays they get got the reverse motivation. The political context of the number would at nowadays endure different: different inwards 2014, facilitating Scottish European Union membership would non endure at nowadays seen equally creating a variety of incentive for a Member State to dissever up, given that the United Kingdom of Great Britain as well as Northern Ireland of Britain as well as Northern Republic of Ireland is leaving the European Union anyway.

Coming dorsum to the EEA, it may endure an attractive selection for an independent Scotland – either equally an interim footstep toward joining the European Union or equally a long-term arrangement. Scotland would non endure covered yesteryear European Union fisheries policy as well as would clearly non endure obliged to bring together Schengen or the unmarried currency. (Norway as well as Republic of Iceland are component of Schengen, but yesteryear way of a separate treaty from the EEA). This selection may also endure to a greater extent than palatable for those Member U.S. worried nearly their ain separatist movements, since it falls brusque of European Union membership.

9 What happens to the remaining EU?

The European Union is apparently a fundamental histrion inwards what happens next, as well as non exclusively inwards the context of negotiations alongside the EU. Some on the Leave side get got hoped for the break-up of the European Union next Brexit – although it’s hard to run across how turmoil in, or the collapse of, its biggest trading partner is inwards the UK’s interests. Certainly at that topographic point are around politicians inwards European Union countries calling for withdrawal referendums of their ain – although none of them are inwards government, as well as it would remain to endure seen what the vote would endure if those referenda were held. We'll apparently get got to expect as well as run across what happens.

The countervailing possibility is that the remaining European Union countries brand renewed efforts to win dorsum populace back upwards yesteryear changes to around unpopular European Union policies as well as practices. I’ll write to a greater extent than before long nearly what such changes mightiness be. One signal though: although the UK’s seat on Brexit negotiations won’t endure confirmed until after the Conservative political party leadership election, as well as so perhaps non until after a full general election, the European Union may good formulate its negotiation seat inwards the meantime.

Photo credit: 

Share this post