Ukip Borders In Addition To Asylum Policy: Yous Cannot Survive Serious

Steve Peers

There’s no uncertainty that the UK of Britain too Northern Republic of Ireland Independence Party (UKIP) has been gaining increased back upward inward recent years, non to the lowest degree because of its policies on immigration – which are linked intrinsically alongside its intention to take away from the European Union.

Undoubtedly leaving the European Union would larn out the UK gratis to regulate fully the movement of people coming from the remaining EU. But what would that truly hateful inward practice? We convey roughly indications today from the party’s immigration spokesman.

Border controls

UKIP would convey a UK-only lane at edge crossings, alongside European Union citizens having to hold off alongside all other nationalities inward the tedious lane. This would violate electrical current European Union law, but of course of report UKIP desire the UK to larn out the EU. So of course of report this innovation is perfectly feasible inward principle, too indeed it’s the logical effect of leaving the EU.

But UKIP don’t elevate the farther consequence: if European Union citizens convey to hold off inward the tedious lane when entering the UK, UK citizens volition likewise convey to hold off inward the tedious lane when entering the remaining European Union countries. Indeed, this is only 1 of the many complications for British citizens that would resultant from leaving the EU, which I detailed inward a post on this blog before this year. So whatever fourth dimension UK citizens mightiness relieve existence fast-tracked equally they supply to the dry ground would survive lost every fourth dimension they watch the EU.

Perhaps UKIP would tell us that nosotros shouldn’t watch Europe too hence much, but instead convey our holidays inward the UK. This reminds me of a UKIP activist I met a few years back, who was personally boycotting all European nutrient too drink. If she hasn’t truly starved to popular off past times now, she’s sure leading a pretty pathetic life.

Asylum

UKIP’s immigration spokesman is quoted equally saying:

"UKIP volition back upward the measures to abolish the provisions of the Dublin Treaty, that says that nosotros cannot pick out to position the dry ground an illegal migrant comes from if they do non convey whatever identifying documents. We volition shipping you lot back."

First of all, the Dublin Regulation isn’t a treaty, it’s a Regulation. But if the UK left the EU, equally UKIP propose, nosotros wouldn’t survive dependent area to the Dublin rules equally such, unless nosotros indeed signed a treaty alongside the European Union to that effect. The European Union has been willing to sign such treaties alongside non-member states: Norway, Iceland, Switzerland too Liechtenstein. (It’s also signed such a treaty alongside 1 of its members – Kingdom of Denmark – for complicated legal reasons).

Would the European Union equally a whole survive willing to sign such a treaty alongside the UK? We tin survive virtually sure that they would not. The European Union has alone been willing to sign such treaties alongside Kingdom of Norway et al because those states non alone convey gratis movement of people alongside the EU, but also are associated alongside the Schengen rules abolishing edge controls. It’s non politically realistic to abolish those controls without having rules on allotment of asylum seekers. Indeed, the get-go appearance of the Dublin rules was equally utilisation of the master copy Schengen Convention of 1990.

If the UK left the EU, it would non survive utilisation of the Schengen system. Indeed the UK doesn’t participate inward Schengen already, too there’s no realistic prospect that it volition e'er do so. And since UKIP loathes immigration from the European Union too hence much, at that spot would non survive gratis movement either. While the European Union mightiness all the same conceivably survive willing to extend the Dublin rules to neighbouring countries (like Serbia, for instance) if that would cut back the expose of asylum-seekers reaching the EU, a Dublin treaty alongside the European Union would convey just the contrary effect.

Could the UK sign side deals alongside private European Union countries? For instance, could it shipping asylum-seekers to French Republic or Hellenic Republic on the ground of bilateral agreements? No. It’s clear past times analogy from the instance police of the CJEU (such equally its really recent judgment on broadcasting rights) that the European Union equally a whole has exclusive competence over the allotment of asylum-seekers equally betwixt European Union Member US too tertiary countries. In fact, inward lite of that recent judgment, the European Union mightiness good convey exclusive external competence over all asylum matters.  

The European Union tin delegate its exclusive competence dorsum to Member States. But if the UK leaves the EU, it’s fair to predict that hell would freeze over before the Commission proposed to let Member US to sign such a deal, or (if it did) that the EP too Council would approve the idea, or that Member US would desire to brand utilisation of such powers equally regards the UK.  

In those circumstances, it would non survive possible to shipping asylum-seekers to whatever European Union Member States. And since the immigration condition of plane passengers from tertiary countries is closely controlled past times carrier sanctions, the primary route for asylum-seekers to piece of occupation to the UK is indeed via dry ground though the EU. Although maybe UKIP believe that since climate modify isn’t happening, it mightiness shortly survive feasible to go past times dry ground from Africa to the UK.

The effect of this is obvious: at that spot would survive more asylum-seekers coming to the UK, non fewer, if the UK left the EU. While refugee advocates would welcome this outcome, it’s clearly the contrary of what UKIP wants to achieve. But maybe nosotros cannot hold off likewise much policy coherence from a political party whose supporters believe that Jesus is on their side to deliver them from European Union tyranny.

[Photo(shop) credit: Jamie East]

Barnard & Peers: chapter 3

Share this post