Rights On The Chopping Block: The Nifty Repeal Nib In Addition To The Ghost Of Henry 8
November 23, 2018
Edit
Joelle Grogan, Lecturer, Middlesex University
Perhaps the near curious facial expression of the Great Repeal Bill is that ‘repeal’ is a misnomer: it volition non repeal to a pregnant extent at all. Rather, the ultimate Act volition initially convert the existing acquis of European Union police push clit into British police push clit at the signal of formal separation from the EU, next the completion of Brexit negotiations. This conversion volition supply about score of certainty in addition to continuity inwards the inevitable turmoil which volition follow UK of Britain in addition to Northern Republic of Ireland withdrawal from the European Union every bit the (at least) initial changes of domestic police push clit volition live relatively minimal.
The chemical percentage of ‘repeal’ inwards the Great Repeal Bill volition instead accept the shape of the incorporation of a Henry VIII clause. Named for the King who forced the passing of the Statute of Proclamations 1539 empowering his decisions both to alter in addition to conduct maintain the same forcefulness every bit legislative acts, such a clause enables authorities to repeal or meliorate principal legislation past times way of a secondary human activeness alongside express or no farther parliamentary scrutiny.[1] For the complexity, intricacy in addition to sheer volume of European Union police push clit which forms utilization of UK of Britain in addition to Northern Republic of Ireland police push clit (for a cake analogy), delegating decisions to secondary legislation makes pragmatic sense: does parliament actually postulate to live bogged downwardly alongside issues such every bit labelling regulations when in that location are to a greater extent than of import debates to live had, merchandise deals to live made, in addition to economical in addition to political crises to live resolved?
Beyond the answer: yes, executive activeness during Brexit hypothesised, it’s possible – if unlikely - that nosotros could witness a novel relevance in addition to forcefulness alongside the ECHR to fill upward a gap inwards rights protection. The ECHR does non conduct maintain equal normative clout every bit direct effective European Union rights, every bit evidenced past times Benkharbouche & Janah. Other survivors would live rights that conduct maintain existed at mutual law, such every bit the rights to personal security, liberty, in addition to property. It’s possible even, that in that location volition live a novel impetus for a ‘British Bill of Rights’, withal misplaced that optimism may be.
Whatever ultimately survives the Great Repeal Bill in addition to a Henry VIII clause, it volition live a shadow of a larger, in addition to probable uneulogized, death. The terminal 7 decades conduct maintain been edifice a progressive narrative of strengthening in addition to enhancing cardinal rights across Europe in addition to the world. Hopeful in addition to aspirational international declarations of human rights conduct maintain led progressively towards the adoption in addition to implementation of to a greater extent than robust in addition to justiciable instruments for the protection of cardinal rights inwards the domestic sphere. Amid political, social, legal in addition to economical crisis, – this narrative is dying. In the electrical flow climate, it is perchance to a greater extent than than the ghost of Henry VIII that volition haunt us.
Image credit: Hans Holbein
[1] House of Lords Select Committee on the Scrutiny of Delegated Powers, HL 57 1992-93, para 10.
[2] HL Constitution Committee 6th Report, HL 51 2010-11, para 6.
[3] For representative Benkharbouche v Sudan, in addition to Janah v Libya wherein the Court of Appeal held that the embassies of Sudan in addition to Great Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya could non rely on the State Immunity Act 1978 to bar occupation rights claims nether the European Union Working Time Directive, every bit it would violate Article 47 CFR which inwards plow required the disapplication of the Act. The Court industrial plant life a violation nether Article half dozen ECHR, but could solely number a annunciation of incompatibility.
