Regulators Without Frontiers? European Regulators Grouping For Audiovisual Media Services (Erga) In Addition To The Audiovisual In Addition To Media Services Directive 2.0

Professor Lorna Woods, University of Essex

The European Commission established ERGA, past times a Decision inward 2014, to facilitate the implementation of the Audiovisual Media Services Directive (AVMSD, or Directive 2010/13/EU) as well as therefore farther the internal market.  This seems to accept been a evolution of the High Level Group of Regulatory Authorities, which was organised past times the Commission (its maiden coming together was 27 March 2003) as well as brought together the Member State authorities responsible for the enforcement inward this champaign for twice yearly meetings. The aim was to reinforce cooperation betwixt national regulatory authorities amongst the aim of ensuring the consistent application of the AVMSD.  It may last seen every bit forming component division of a tendency at European Union bird to do networks – fifty-fifty those involving Member State actors – to back upwards or fifty-fifty intensify harmonisation. As such they may last component division of a shift away from decentralised enforcement to a to a greater extent than centralised approach.  Such a evolution is past times no agency certain, but it suggests that discussions well-nigh the piece of job as well as powers of whatever such torso has a to a greater extent than than technical significance.

The Decision establishing ERGA described its tasks as:

(a) to advise as well as aid the Commission, inward its piece of job to ensure a consistent implementation inward all Member U.S. of A. of the regulatory framework for audiovisual media services;

(b) to aid as well as advise the Commission, every bit to whatever affair related to audiovisual media services inside the Commission's competence. If justified inward social club to advise the Commission on sure issues, the grouping may consult marketplace participants, consumers as well as end-users inward social club to collect the necessary information;

(c) to render for an substitution of sense as well as goodness exercise every bit to the application of regulatory framework for audiovisual media services;

(d) to cooperate as well as render its members amongst the information necessary for the application of the Directive 2010/13/EU, every bit provided for inward Article xxx of Directive 2010/13/EU, inward particular every bit regards Articles 2, iii as well as 4 thereof (the basic rules on cross-border broadcasting).

ERGA’s establishment was therefore non foreseen past times the 2007 version of the AVMSD, as well as ERGA operated inward improver to the Contact Committee that had been created past times Article 29 of the directive.  Implicitly, this suggests that the Contact Committee was non sufficient inward the Commission’s see for consistent as well as effective implementation of the AVMSD across the Member States. Influenza A virus subtype H5N1 European Parliament resolution from 2004 already ‘[r]egret[ed] that the Contact Committee established nether the television set without frontiers is by as well as large composed of representatives of the national authorities ministries as well as non past times members of independent media regulatory authorities’. 

In the eyes of some, the Contact Committee did non – every bit a affair of shape – allow for the cooperation of the national regulatory authorities, every bit those regulators did non necessarily participate inward the Contact Committee. That province of affairs could adversely touching consistency inward pan-EU application of the AVMSD as well as plough over ascent to concerns well-nigh enforcement, particularly inward the cross-border context as well as the risks of an unequal playing champaign (as betwixt the approaches of the diverse Member States). The introduction of unopen to other forum for experts to percentage sense also raises questions well-nigh the departure betwixt ERGA as well as the Contact Committee (if any) as well as their respective roles – particularly given that at that topographic point is already a platform for media regulators (EPRA), albeit i that lies exterior the European Union framework. 

Is the significance of the proposal an endeavour to delineate betwixt effective enforcement (which would autumn to ERGA) as well as the evolution of policy (which is the responsibleness of the to a greater extent than political body, the Contact Committee)? This betoken has indeed been made past times the Chair of ERGA. Or is ERGA only ‘more European’ than the Contact Committee past times virtue of its members’ independence from national political objectives, for example?  That ERGA is well-nigh to a greater extent than than effective enforcement finds unopen to back upwards inward the report of EPRA which describes ERGA every bit belongings ‘strategic European Union policy-oriented discussions’ as well as ‘intend[ing] to adopt mutual positions or declarations on the implementation of the audiovisual European Union regulatory framework’.

Moving to the directive, Art. 30A of the revised AVMSD (re-)establishes ERGA, a seemingly uncontroversial betoken from the Commission’s proposal which was unchanged through the legislative process. The Commission envisaged that ERGA would last composed of national ‘independent regulatory authorities’ inward the champaign of audiovisual media services, therefore linking this to the novel provisions on the independent regulatory authorities introduced inward Article xxx (containing provisions to ensure independence).  By contrast, the Contact Committee is ‘composed or representatives of the competent authorities of the Member States’ as well as is chaired past times a Commission representative.  Apart from an endeavour past times the European Parliament to install 4 MEPs on the Contact Committee (unsuccessfully), this construction remained unchanged.  So piece the Contact Committee may accept representatives from the relevant national regulatory authorities, it may non inward abide by of all Member States.

The departure inward membership is significant: the Commission’s proposal sought to ensure that it was the independent regulators, rather than Government ministers or senior civil servants, which participated inward ERGA. The Commission hither would no longer last controlling the meetings (as chair) but last ‘down-graded’ to participant.  This besides is of import inward price of ensuring that ERGA itself is independent from the Commission, every bit good every bit from Member U.S. of A. as well as commercial interests.  The wording has been amended slightly through the legislative physical care for to include the reference to national regulatory authorities and/or bodies inward the champaign of audiovisual media services.  This modify may last semantic to reverberate the actual nature of the relevant institutions, but arguably weakens the link to the independent regulators required past times Article 30.  Insofar every bit this independence requirement mightiness last seen every bit a fact making these regulators to a greater extent than European Union focussed rather than opened upwards to national policy initiatives (as has been seen inward other sectors, e.g. telecommunications), the modify mightiness last an endeavour to bound the supranational chemical component of the proposal. This is inward contrast to the Contact Committee, which could good accept (national) political undercurrents, given that its membership mightiness include politicians as well as civil servants every bit good every bit or instead of technical experts. 

The master Commission proposal to a greater extent than or less tracked the tasks ascribed to ERGA inward its 2016 conclusion amongst the improver of the chore of giving opinions, when as well as so requested, ‘..on the issues envisaged inward Articles 2(5b) [new provisions on allotment of jurisdiction], 6a(3) [co-regulatory systems as well as the evolution of Union codes of conduct], 9(2) [self/co-regulation inward relation to nutrient as well as drinkable that are high inward salt, sugars or fatty (HFSS)], 9(4) [sharing best practice/union codes of acquit inward abide by of HFSS foods as well as drink] as well as on whatever affair relating to audiovisual media services, inward particular on the protection of minors as well as incitement to hatred’.  This may reverberate the powerfulness of the Commission, nether Article 3(1) of the Decision, to consult ERGA ‘on whatever affair relating to audiovisual media’ - wording that is reflected inward the recitals to the AVMSD (recital 37). With the focus on novel forms of governance, it could last said that the Commission envisaged ERGA every bit having a meaning piece of job that maybe went beyond the thought of enforcement alone, though the involvement inward jurisdiction as well as anti-circumvention decisions is inward itself of import (though greenback that the database containing the details of which service provider is established where is the responsibleness of the Commission rather than – every bit suggested past times the Parliament inward its AMD 52, the responsibleness of the Commission as well as ERGA).

These provisions did non rest unchanged. The initial see of the European Parliament’s articulation rapporteurs was that ERGA should rest a consultative torso without decision-making powerfulness as well as that to a greater extent than competences should last given to the Contact Committee (with a revised constitution to include 4 MEPs). To this end, the Parliament proposed that the Contact Committee should last provided amongst relevant information every bit regards Article iii [freedom of reception/derogation procedures], 4 [circumvention provisions] as well as seven [accessibility provisions] – the start 2 points of which are straightaway inward the directive. 

The Council’s see of ERGA’s piece of job hither was also to a greater extent than limited than the Commission’s proposal, though it seems that at that topographic point were unopen to differences inward views betwixt the Member States. Council amendments limited ERGA to giving technical advice – though what ‘technical’ inward this context agency is rather uncertain – does it relate to matters relating to technology scientific discipline (surely not) or instead advice inward the practical implementation of the rules? It seems that full general policy advice may prevarication exterior ERGA’s competence, reflecting inward wide price the sectionalization of roles betwixt ERGA as well as the Contact Committee. The Council proposals also resulted inward the deletion of ERGA’s piece of job inward the reference to self as well as co-regulation inward Article 9.  The Council also pushed dorsum against the Commission’s command of ERGA inward that the Commission proposal envisaged that the Commission was to last empowered to adopt ERGA’s rules of procedure.  According the Council’s view, this falls to ERGA itself.  Under the 2016 Decision, ERGA had a limited powerfulness to heighten issues. Article 2(2) provided that:

The chairperson of the grouping may advise the Commission to consult the grouping on a specific question.

This chore does non appear inward the listing of tasks enumerated inward the AVMSD – it is, perhaps, a reflection of the fact that ERGA does non or should non accept a policy role.

ERGA seems to last to a greater extent than limited than the Contact Committee. The tasks of the Contact Committee are quite open-ended. It is to ‘facilitate effective implementation’ of the AVMSD – all of it – but inward improver its compass is extended to ‘any other matters on which exchanges of views are deemed essential’ (Article 29(2)(a) as well as recital 32a). There is overlap amongst the tasks of ERGA inward that both are concerned inward the substitution of best exercise inward relation to the derogation provisions inward Article 3(5). The AVMSD identifies farther specific areas where the Contact Committee is to last consulted. For example, it is the Contact Committee as well as non ERGA that is to last consulted on the evolution of Union codes of acquit (the evolution of which is stated to last ‘in accordance amongst the principles of subsidiarity as well as proportionality (Article 4a(2) tertiary para)).  In the context of the evolution of guidance on the calculation of marketplace percentage (Article 13(5a)) as well as listed events (Article 14(2)), the Commission is empowered to consult the Contact Committee non ERGA. While ERGA may last requested to plough over an opinion, the Contact Committee may render opinions on its ain initiative. Further, inward improver to responding to requests from the Commission, the Contact Committee may also answer to Member States’ requests. The Contact Committee’s piece of job extends to ‘examin[ing] whatever evolution arising inward the sector on which an substitution of views appears useful’ (Article 29(2)(f)).  This gives the Contact Committee an agenda setting component division which tin plough over the axe also last seen inward the fact that the Contact Committee discusses what should last included inward the reports that are submitted past times the Member U.S. of A. to the Commission on implementation of the AVMSD (see guidance issued past times Contact Committee).

In sum, ERGA is confirmed every bit component division of the apparatus for consistent enforcement of the AVMSD.  While it may last the representative that at that topographic point is a distinction betwixt the policy discussions as well as the coordination of enforcement, it seems that at that topographic point accept been unlike views inside the institutions every bit to the piece of job of ERGA as well as these mightiness non become away on the coming into strength of the revised AVMSD. While nosotros appear to consider how ERGA operates inward exercise as well as interacts amongst the Contact Committee it tin plough over the axe last said that, on a sliding scale of pan-EU regulators ranging from European Union agencies at the move past times to informal groupings at the bottom, the ERGA lies close the bottom amongst its narrowly drawn, technical advisory role.

Photo credit: flickr

Share this post