‘Inside’ The European Parliament’S Shut Reading Rooms: Transparency Inwards The Eu

Dr Vigjilenca Abazi

Assistant Professor of European Law

Maastricht University

  

What produce documents virtually negotiations of the Transatlantic Trade in addition to Investment Partnership (TTIP), oversight of the EU’s Food Safety Authority or Tax-Justice stimulate got inwards common? In guild to access these documents, (selected) Members of the European Parliament are requested to attend closed reading rooms. This spider web log post service discusses how an exception to opened upwardly parliamentary oversight is increasingly becoming a regular institutional exercise in addition to questions its spillover lawsuit on requests for populace access to documents.

Background

As the wording suggests, ‘closed reading rooms’ are meetings that stimulate got house behind unopen doors amongst the role of reading sure sensitive documents, peculiarly European Union official secrets. Documents are distributed at the laid about of the coming together in addition to collected in 1 lawsuit again at the end; documents may non live on copied yesteryear whatever means, such every bit photocopying or photographing; no notes may live on taken; in addition to the minutes of the coming together cannot brand whatever refer of the give-and-take of the item containing official secrets (Art. 6, Interinstitutional Agreement betwixt the European Parliament in addition to the Council of 12 March 2014).


Closed reading rooms are an exception to by in addition to large opened upwardly meetings in addition to discussions of the European Parliament. This exercise emerged amongst the introduction of rules on European Union official secrets in addition to specifically the Interinstitutional Agreement of 2002 betwixt the European Parliament in addition to the Council concerning European Parliament’s access to sensitive data inwards the plain of safety in addition to defense policy (see Art. iii in addition to Annex, 2nd paragraph). The rationale of what this Agreement called ‘secured room’ was to brand sensitive documents available for purposes of parliamentary oversight without ‘risks’ of populace disclosure or possible leaks, i.e. unauthorised disclosure of documents.

Initially, this exercise was mostly confined to the expanse of safety in addition to defense for documents classified every bit official secrets. Yet, amongst the expansion of rules on European Union official secrets to areas good beyond safety in addition to defense to ‘activities inwards all areas that require treatment classified information’ via a Council Decision on official secrets inwards 2013, the exercise of unopen reading rooms yesteryear MEPs to access sensitive documents became an increasing practice.

Closed Oversight

At initiative of all glance, unopen reading rooms, or to a greater extent than by in addition to large ‘closed oversight’ (as I stimulate got elaborated in-depth inwards this recent article), might look an inevitable institutional exercise when dealing amongst official secrets in addition to for certain this is non an number confined to the EU, but a much wider globe exercise of oversight (e.g. reckon hither for a here in addition to here). However, illustration police describe does non address the mode inwards which these documents should live on read in addition to importantly, primary police describe entirely refers that accessibility to data is ‘immediately in addition to fully’ (see Art. 218(10) TFEU) amongst no farther details every bit to how access ought to live on organised.

What virtually populace deliberation?

A crucial role for the European Parliament every bit the straight representative of citizens (Art. 10 TEU) is to render a link betwixt what takes house inwards Brussels in addition to what citizens know. But actively creating infinite for populace deliberation in addition to prompting populace fence on issues that are overseen behind unopen doors stay yet to live on delivered yesteryear the European Parliament.

Spillover Effect Even to Public Access to Information?

Recently 4 MEPs filed a populace access asking to the European Food Safety Authority to gain access to unpublished studies determining the carcinogenicity of glyphosate on terra firma of which EFSA made its assessments. EFSA was non straight off opened upwardly to render populace access to these studies. Remarkably, inwards its response, EFSA offers a ‘physical reading room’ for the MEPs to read these studies in addition to reasons that the owners of these studies look opened upwardly to sharing the studies inwards this manner.

In other words, the EFSA is offering the MEPs a unopen room to read the studies every bit a reply to a public access asking that should termination inwards making the documents public, non entirely for these 4 MEPs but besides for the full general public. It should live on stressed that the European Union populace access to documents authorities does non foresee ‘physical reading rooms’ in addition to indeed that would live on opposite fifty-fifty to its rationale of granting the widest possible populace access to documents. It seems that inwards the eyes of EFSA, a unopen reading room offers a ‘solution’ to the potential unwillingness of the authors of these studies to bring out the documents. Yet, this possibility is besides completely exterior the legal contours of populace access to information. Legally, authors of these studies produce non stimulate got a veto on whether the studies would live on populace in addition to for certain produce non stimulate got prerogatives to create upwardly one's hear how populace access to documents should live on organised inwards practice.

The EFSA reply is ongoing in addition to the 4 MEPs stimulate got even in addition to hence non received access to all requested documents. Yet, beyond this case, is the exercise of unopen reading rooms expanding non entirely to institutional access but besides to public access to documents? This is a number that nosotros should operate along to show to a greater extent than closely. 

Barnard & Peers: chapter 8

Photo credit: commons.wikimedia.org

Share this post